Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:07:05.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Gail Jefferson
Gail Jefferson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risqué, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component. (Sociology, psychology, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, sociolinguistics)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 435 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jefferson, G. (1984). On a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “yeah” and “mm hmm.” Papers in Linguistics 17(2):197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (n.d.). Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981a). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a troubles-telling and a service encounter. Journal of Pragmarics 5(5):399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981b). On the articulation of topic in conversation. Final report to the Social Science Research Council, December.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. (1984). On laughter in pursuit of intimacy. Working Papers and Pre-Publications. Series C, Number 135, 06. The Intemational Center of Semiotics and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing device.” Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4): 186–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1985). On doing “being ordinary.” In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press. 413–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Presidential Committee on the Assassination of President Kennedy (1965). The witnesses. New York Times, special edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar