Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:25:43.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

N. J. Enfield, Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xviii, 278. Hb. $74.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2015

Robert B. Arundale
Robert B. Arundale*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK, 99775, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Language in Society , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , September 2015 , pp. 584 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arundale, Robert B. (2010). Relating. In Locher, Miriam A. & Graham, Sage L. (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 137–65. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Robert T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory 9:119–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). Relationship thinking and human pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 41:60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus (2009). On communicating: Otherness, meaning, and information. Ed. by Bermejo, Fernando. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stewart, John (1995). Language as articulate contact: Toward a post-semiotic philosophy of communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar