Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:12:22.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Literacy - Robert B. Kaplan, Alison d'Anglejan, J Ronayne Cowan, Braj B. Kachru, and G. Richard Tucker (eds.), Annual review of applied linguistics 1983. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1984. Pp. xv + 199.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jennifer E. Spratt
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6216

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Downing, J. (ed.) (1973). Comparative reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes of reading and writing. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Feitelson, D. (ed.) (1978). Cross-cultural perspectives on reading and reading research. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1974). Origins of Western literacy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communications 30:123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society 11:4976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudelson, S. (ed.) (1981). Learning to read in different languages. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. P. (1974). Achieving school failure: An anthropological approach to illiteracy and social stratification. In Spindler, G. D. (ed.), Education and cultural process: Toward an anthropology of education. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 82118.Google Scholar
McDermott, R. P. (1977). The cultural context of learning to read. In Wanat, S. (ed.), Issues in evaluating reading. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. 1018.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B., & Weaver, P. A. (eds.) (1979). Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schuman, H., Inkeles, A., & Smith, D. (1967). Some social psychological effects and noneffects of literacy in a new nation. Economic Development and Cultural Change 16:114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1978a). Unpackaging literacy. Social Science Information 17:1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1978b). Literacy without schooling: Testing intellectual effects. Harvard Educational Review 48:448–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (eds.) (1980). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lucker, G. W., & Lee, S. (1981). Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English. Cognitive Science. Technical Report No. 31.Google Scholar
Sticht, T. G. (1977). Comprehending reading at work. In Just, M. & Carpenter, P. (eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading comprehension in fifteen countries: An empirical study. (International Studies in Evaluation III.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar