Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:56:55.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Areas - J. V. Neustupný, Post-structural approaches to language: Language theory in a Japanese context. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1978, Pp. vii + 307.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Paul O. Takahara
Paul O. Takahara
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 374 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The structure and use of politeness formulas. Language in Society 5(2): 13 7–15 I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, L. (1976). The second time around: Cognitive and social strategies in second language acquisition. Stanford University. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts 3. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harada, S. I. (1976). Honorifics. In Shibatani, M. (ed), Syntax and semantics: Japanese generative grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ide, S. (1977). The importance of speech formulas in Japanese polite expressions. Lecture given at University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1977). Eigo ken ni okeru keigo. In Oono, S. & Sibata, T. (eds.). Iwanami kooza: Keigo. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. (1978). Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Miller., R. A. (1977). The Japanese language in contemporary Japan: Some sociolinguistic observations. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Minami, F. (1974) Gendai nihongo no koozo. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Munby., J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design: A sociolinguistic model for defining the content of purpose-specific language programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neustupný, J. V. (1974). The modernization of the Japanese system of Communication. Language in Society 3(1):33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, J. V. (1975). Review of Einar Haugen, The ecology of language. Language 51(1):236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, F. C. C. (1979). Communicative distance. Language Sciences 31. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center for the Language Sciences.Google Scholar
Sibata, T. (1978). Shakaigengogaku no kadai. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (ed.) (1979). English and Japanese in contrast. New York: Regents Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Vachek, J. (1976). Sociolinguistics seen from the Prague point-of-view. In Viereck, W. (Hrsg.), Sprachliches handelin — soziales verhalten: Ein reader zur pragmalinguistik und soziolinguistik. Munchen: Wilhem Fink Verlag.Google Scholar