Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:50:17.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How'd you get that accent?: Acquiring a second dialect of the same language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2007

SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE  and
SONJA MOLFENTER
SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, 130 St George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3H1, [email protected]
SONJA MOLFENTER
Affiliation:
Department of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a case study of second dialect acquisition by three children over six years as they shift from Canadian to British English. Informed by Chambers's principles of second dialect acquisition, the analysis focuses on a frequent and socially embedded linguistic feature, T-voicing (e.g., pudding versus putting). An extensive corpus and quantitative methods permit tracking the shift to British English as it is happening. Although all of the children eventually sound local, the acquisition process is complex. Frequency of British variants rises incrementally, lagging behind the acquisition of variable constraints, which are in turn ordered by type. Internal patterns are acquired early, while social correlates lag behind. Acceleration of second dialect variants occurs at well-defined sociocultural milestones, particularly entering the school system. Successful second dialect acquisition is a direct consequence of sustained access to and integration with the local speech community.We would like to thank Tara, Shaman, and Freya for their patience and humor in letting us analyze these materials, and especially for the hilarity of their antics, which added greatly to the amount of fun we had in figuring out their second dialect acquisition. This study was inspired by and has also profited from many discussions with our mentor and friend Jack Chambers. We have also benefited from the insightful guidance of Peter Trudgill, both in print and in personal commentary. An anonymous reviewer added an additional perspective. Of course, none of them is responsible for any remaining shortcomings of our analysis or interpretation.

Keywords

second dialect acquisitionchild language variationT-voicingmobility
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , November 2007 , pp. 649 - 675
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E. A.; Marchman, V.; Thal, D. J.; Fenson, L.; Reznick, J. S.; Reilly, J.; & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 21:85–123.Google Scholar
Bayard, Donn (1995). Peers versus parents: A longitudinal study of rhotic–nonrhotic accommodation in an NZE speaking child. New Zealand English Newsletter 9:15–22.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chambers, J. K. (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language 68:673–705.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2002). Dynamics of dialect convergence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6:117–30.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Malden: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope (1997). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fabricius, Anne H. (2002). Ongoing change in modern RP: Evidence for the disappearing stigma of t-glottaling. English World-Wide 23:115–36.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph (1971). Minding your z's and d's: Distinguishing syntactic and phonological variable rules. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, 360–67. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Fasold, Ralph (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Foulkes, Paul; Docherty, Gerry; & Watt, Dominic (1999). Tracking the emergence of structured variation: Realisations of (t) by Newcastle children. In Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 7:1–18.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. (1985). The identification of morphemes. In V. Clark P. Escholz & A. Rosa (eds.), The identification of morphemes, 257–65. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.
Hirayama, Manami (2003). T-glottaling in York English. Ph.D. Generals paper, University of Toronto, Department of Linguistics.
Horvath, Barbara M., & Horvath, Ronald J. (2003). A closer look at the constraint hierarchy: Order, contrast, and geographical scale. Language Variation and Change 15:143–70.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Kerswill, Paul (1996). Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8:177–202.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1970, 1972). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23:30–87. Repr. in William Labov (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns, 183–259. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:85–97.Google Scholar
Milroy, James; Milroy, Lesley; & Hartley, S. (1994a). Local and supra-local change in British English: The case of glottalisation. English World-Wide 15:1–32.Google Scholar
Milroy, James; Milroy, Lesley; Hartley, S.; & Walshaw, David (1994b). Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6:327–57.Google Scholar
Neu, Helen (1980). Ranking of constraints on /t,d/ deletion in American English: A statistical analysis. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 37–54. New York: Academic Press.
Payne, Arvilla C. (1976). The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Payne, Arvilla C. (1980). Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 143–78. New York: Academic Press.
Pinker, Steven (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reid, Euan (1978). Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold.
Roberts, Julie (1994). Acquisition of variable rules: (t,d) deletion and (ing) production in preschool children. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Roberts, Julie (1997a). Acquisition of a variable rule: A study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24:351–72.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie (1997b). Hitting a moving target: Acquisition of sound change in progress by Philadelphia children. Language Variation and Change 9:249–66.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie (2002). Child language variation. In J. K. Chambers Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 333–48. Malden: Blackwell.
Roberts, Julie (2005). Acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. In Martin Ball (ed.), Clinical sociolinguistics, 153–64. Oxford: Blackwell.
Roberts, Julie, & Labov, William (1995). Learning to talk Philadelphian: The acquisition of short a by pre-school children. Language Variation and Change 7:101–12.Google Scholar
Smith, Jennifer; Durham, Mercedes; & Fortune, Liane (2007). Morphology vs. phonology in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19:63–99.Google Scholar
Starks, Donna, & Bayard, Donn (2002). Individual variation in the acquisition of postvocalic /r/: Day care and sibling order as potential variables. American Speech 77:184–94.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane (1999). Glottals past and present: A study of T-glottaling in Glaswegian. Leeds Studies in English 30:181–204.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trudgill, Peter J. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Trudgill, Peter J. (1988). Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide 9:33–49.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel; Labov, William; & Herzog, Marvin (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Wexler, Kenneth, & Culicover, Peter W. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolfram, Walt (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Wolfram, Walt (1989). Structural variability in phonological development: final nasal in vernacular black English. In Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Language change and variation, 301–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wolfram, Walt, & Hatfield, Deborah (1984). Tense marking in second language learning: Patterns of spoken and written English in a Vietnamese community. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Yang, Charles D. (2003). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.