Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:32:02.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2006

Jack Sidnell
Jack Sidnell
Affiliation:
Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. M5S 3H1, Canada, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. Pp. 300. Hb $138.00, Pb $65.95.

Conversation analysis developed in the mid to late 1960s in a collaboration initially between Harvey Sacks and Emanuel Schegloff and, somewhat later, with the addition of Gail Jefferson. By the early 1970s, several students joined the group, by this point based at the University of California campuses at Irvine and Los Angeles, to form what Lerner calls “the first generation.” Conversation analysis has continued to grow, indeed has flourished, in the years since. Today conversation analysts are to be found not only in the United Stated, Canada, and the United Kingdom, but also Japan, Korea, Germany, Finland, the Netherlands, and many other countries. There are conversation analysts in departments of sociology, linguistics, anthropology, communication, and psychology, as well as in many modern language and applied programs. The widespread success of conversation analysis is largely attributable to three characteristics of its research program:

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , November 2006 , pp. 779 - 784
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clayman, S. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems 35:474–492.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9:47–96.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1983). Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. V. D'Urso & P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric, 11–38. Padua: Cleup.
Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, 3:25–34. New York: Academic Press
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E. A.; & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075–1095.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone openings. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language, 23–78. New York: Erlbaum.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12:55–62.Google Scholar