Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:46:14.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2017

Lal Zimman
Lal Zimman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Lal Zimman, University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Linguistics, Mail Code 3100, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3100[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the importance of gender differences in the voice, sociolinguists have not paid sufficient attention to the sociolinguistic processes through which phonetic resources are mobilized in the construction of a gendered voice. This article argues that gender differences in the voice—including those influenced by physiology—are best understood as elements of sociolinguistic style rather than static properties. With a focus on transgender speakers in the early stages of masculinizing hormone therapy, the analysis demonstrates the complex interrelationship of the gendered meanings attributable to characteristics like fundamental frequency and /s/. Trans speakers challenge systems for categorizing voices as female or male, which assume that different aspects of the gendered voice will pattern together in normative ways. Yet a voice's gender is not a unidimensional feature, but a cluster of features that take on meaning only in context with one another, leaving them open for recombination and change through stylistic bricolage. (Transgender, style, gender, voice, pitch, sibilants)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 339 - 370
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Richard K., & van Borsel, John (2006). Female-to-male considerations. In Adler, Richard K., Hirsch, Sandy, & Mordaunt, Michelle (eds.), Voice and communication therapy for the transgender/transsexual client: A comprehensive clinical guide, 139–67. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H. Samy (2004). You know my steez: An ethnographic and sociolinguistic study of styleshifting in a Black American speech community. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara (2009). /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City's Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(5):634–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Paul C.; Dabbs, James M. Jr.; Fielden;, Julie A. & Lutter, Candice D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and losing among fans at sporting events. Physiology & Behavior 65(1):59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33(4):469–516.Google Scholar
Busby, Peter A., & Plant, Geoff L. (1995). Formant frequency values of vowels produced by preadolescent boys and girls. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(4):2603–7.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1):32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86(1):52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constansis, Alexandros N. (2008). The changing female-to-male (FTM) voice. Radical Musicology 3. Online: http://www.radical-musicology.org.uk.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2003). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damrose, Edward J. (2009). Quantifying the impact of androgen therapy on the female larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx 36(1):110–12.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie (2009). A sociophonetic ethnography of Selwyn Girls’ High. ,Christchurch: University of Canterbury dissertation.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa (2003). The twilight of equality? Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2004). The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum 47(1):41–43.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–90.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (2007). Putting communities of practice in their place. Gender & Language 1(1):27–37.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, McConnell-Ginet, Sally & Rickford, John R. (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Sarah; Neave, Nick; Wakelin, Delia; & Hamilton, Colin (2008). The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males. Physiology & Behavior 93(4–5):783–88.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, Grant (1960). Voice and articulation drillbook. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Ferrand, Carole T., & Bloom, Ronald L. (1996). Gender differences in children's intonational patterns. Journal of Voice 10(3):284–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, James L., & Holbrook, Anthony (1970). Modal vocal fundamental frequency of young adults. Archives of Otolaryngology 92:379–82.Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh, & Giedd, Jay (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(3):1511–22.Google Scholar
Flipsen, Peter Jr.; Shrilberg, Lawrence; Weismer, Gary; Karlsson, Heather; & McSweeny, Jane (1999). Acoustic characteristics of /s/ in adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(3):663–77.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne, & Toda, Martine (2010). Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine, & Zygis, Marzena (eds.), An interdisciplinary guide to turbulent sounds, 281–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gafter, Roey J. (2016). What's a stigmatized variant doing in the word list? Authenticity in reading styles and Hebrew pharyngeal. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(1):31–58.Google Scholar
Gaudio, Rudolf P. (1994). Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech 69(1):30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew; Barthmaier, Paul; & Sands, Kathy (2002). A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32(2):141–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1968/2001). The speech community. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 43–52. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren (2009). Ethnicity and phonetic variation in a San Francisco neighborhood. Unpublished dissertation, Linguistics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Hasek, Carol S., Singh, Sadanand & Murry, Thomas. (1980). Acoustic attributes of preadolescent voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68(5):1262–65.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heffernan, Kevin (2004). Evidence from HNR that /s/ is a social marker of gender. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23(2):71–84.Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry; Green, Rachel; & Massey, Karen (1994). Longitudinal research on adolescent voice change in males. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(5):2646–53.Google Scholar
Hollien, Harry, Green, Rachel; & Massey, Karen & Paul, Patricia (1969). A second evaluation of the speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of post-adolescent girls. Language and Speech 12(2):119–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollien, Harry, Green, Rachel; & Massey, Karen & Paul, Patricia & Shipp, Thomas (1972). Speaking fundamental frequency and chronologic age in males. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 15(1):155–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymes, Dell (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, Thomas & Sturtevant, William C. (eds.), Anthropology and human behavior, 13–53. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Ingrisano, Dennis; Weismer, Gary; & Schuckers, Gordon H. (1980). Sex identification of preschool children. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 32(1):61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulick, Don (1999). Transgender and language: A review of the literature and suggestions for the future. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 5(4):605–22.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:243–85.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1966/2006). The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Sungbok; Potamianos, Alexandros; & Narayanan, Shrikanth (1999). Acoustics of children's speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(3):1455–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levi-Strauss, Claude (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez (2007). Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society 36(4):533–54.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez (2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43(5):539–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linke, C. E. (1973). A study of pitch characteristics of female voices and their relationship to vocal effectiveness. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 25:173–85.Google Scholar
Loveday, Leo (1981). Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation. Language and Speech 24(1):71–88.Google Scholar
Majewski, Wojciech; Hollien, Harry; & Zalewski, Janusz (1972). Speaking fundamental frequency of Polish adult males. Phonetica 25(2):119–25.Google Scholar
Massad, Joseph (2007). Desiring Arabs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, Catherine (2007). Re-inhabiting an uninhabitable body: Interventions in voice production with transsexual men. Research in Drama Education 12(2):195–206.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2008). Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2011). The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(2):261–80.Google Scholar
Munson, Benjamin (2007). The acoustic correlates of perceived sexual orientation, perceived masculinity, and perceived femininity. Language and Speech 50(1):125–42.Google Scholar
Papp, Viktória (2011). Speaker gender: Physiology, performance and perception. Houston, TX: Rice University dissertation.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai; Maegaard, Marie; Spindler Møller;, Janus & Kristiansen, Tore (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4):478–504.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011). Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39(3):233–64.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sara J.; & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2002). Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J., & Wong, Andrew (eds.), Language and sexuality: Contesting meaning in theory and practice, 175–89. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sara J.; & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn & Van Hofwegen, Janneke (2016). /s/exuality in small-town California: Gender normativity and the acoustic realization of /s/. In Levon, Erez & Mendes, Ronald Beline (eds.), Language, sexuality, and power: Studies in intersectional sociolinguistics, 168–88. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jacqueline (1975). Cues to the identification of sex in children's speech. In Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance, 152–71. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (2002). Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 375–401. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Martin F. (1968). Identification of speaker sex from isolated voiceless fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43(5):1178–79.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. (1990). Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 187–209. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. (1991). The effect of geometry on source mechanisms of fricative consonants. Journal of Phonetics 19(3–4):409–24.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. (2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2):621–40.Google Scholar
Stoicheff, Margaret L. (1981). Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of nonsmoking female adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 24(3):437–41.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane (2007). Empirical evidence for gendered speech production: /s/ in Glaswegian. In Cole, Jennifer, & Ignacio Hualde, José (eds.), Laboratory phonology 9, 65–86. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Szakay, Anita (2006). Rhythm and pitch as markers of ethnicity in New Zealand English. In Warren, Paul & Watson, Catherine I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, 421–26. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Titze, Ingo R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85(4):1699–1707.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut, & Eriksson, Anders (1995). The frequency range of the voice fundamental in the speech of male and female adults. Stockholm: Stockholm University, ms. Online: http://www.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/f0_m&f.pdf; accessed August 17, 2010.Google Scholar
Valentine, David (2007). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
van Borsel, John; de Cuypere, Griet; Rubens, Robert; & Destaerke, B. (2000). Voice problems in female-to- male transsexuals. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 35(3):427–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteside, Sandra P. (2001). Sex-specific fundamental and formant frequency patterns in a cross- sectional study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110(1):464–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteside, Sandra P., & Marshall, Jeni (2001). Developmental trends in voice onset time: Some evidence for sex differences. Phonetica 58(3):196–210.Google Scholar
Yuasa, Ikuko Patricia (2008). Culture and gender of voice pitch: A sociophonetic comparison of the Japanese and Americans. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2012). Voices in transition: Testosterone, transmasculinity, and the gendered voice among female-to-male transgender people. Boulder: University of Colorado, Boulder dissertation.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2013). Hegemonic masculinity and the variability of gay-sounding speech: The perceived sexuality of transgender men. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1):5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2015). Transmasculinity and the voice: Gender assignment, identity, and presentation. In Milani, Tommaso (ed.), Language and masculinities: Performances, intersections, dislocations, 197–219. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zimman, Lal (2016). Agency and the gendered voice: Metalinguistic rejections of vocal masculinization among female-to-male transgender speakers. In Babel, Anna (ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, 253–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar