Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:05:17.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief communications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Brief communications
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 625 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Liberman, K. (1985). Understanding interaction in central Australia: An ethnomethodology of Australian Aboriginal people. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Myers, F. (1986). Pintupi country, Pintupi self. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian.Google Scholar
Sansom, B. (1980). The camp at Wallaby Cross. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage. Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2nd ed., as separate book, 1987.)Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W. (1985). How children start arguments. Language in Society 14:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, D., ter Berg, T. & van der Weide, J. (1989). Confrontatie tijdens het spelen, Een onderrzoek naar de wijze waarop 11-jarigue kinderen omgaan met confrontaties tijdens hun spel. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 11(2).Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1982). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht.Google Scholar