Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T20:42:35.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Chris Sinha ,
Vera Da Silva Sinha ,
Jörg Zinken  and
Wany Sampaio
Chris Sinha
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Vera Da Silva Sinha
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Jörg Zinken
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Wany Sampaio*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Rondônia
*
Correspondence addresses: Professor Chris Sinha, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is widely assumed that there is a natural, prelinguistic conceptual domain of time whose linguistic organization is universally structured via metaphoric mapping from the lexicon and grammar of space and motion. We challenge this assumption on the basis of our research on the Amondawa (Tupi Kawahib) language and culture of Amazonia. Using both observational data and structured field linguistic tasks, we show that linguistic space-time mapping at the constructional level is not a feature of the Amondawa language, and is not employed by Amondawa speakers (when speaking Amondawa). Amondawa does not recruit its extensive inventory of terms and constructions for spatial motion and location to express temporal relations. Amondawa also lacks a numerically based calendric system. To account for these data, and in opposition to a Universal Space-Time Mapping Hypothesis, we propose a Mediated Mapping Hypothesis, which accords causal importance to the numerical and artefact-based construction of time-based (as opposed to event-based) time interval systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 137 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, H. 1910. Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Transl. Pogson, F. L.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Berman, R. & Slobin, D. I. (eds.). 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. 1977. The past and the present in the present. Man 12(2). 278–292.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. 1996. Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition 60. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnemeyer, J. 2010. The language-specificity of conceptual structure: path, fictive motion and time relations. In Malt, B. & Wolff, P. (eds.), Words and the mind: How words encode human experience, 111–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43. 1–22.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Transl. Nice, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. & Pagliuca, W.. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. 2008. Who's afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 58: Suppl. 1. 63–79.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. 2010. Space for thinking. In Evans, V. & Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, 453–478. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics and the child. In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 27–63. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davis, R. 1976. The Northern Thai Calendar and its uses. Anthropos 71. 3–32.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E. & Pica, P.. 2008. Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320. 1217–1220.Google Scholar
Edmonson, M. S. 1976. The Mayan Reform of 11.16.0.0.0. Current Anthropology 17(4). 713–717.Google Scholar
Evans, V. 2004. The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1939. Nuer time-reckoning. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 12(2). 189–216.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. Nuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Everett, D. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã (including commentary). Current Anthropology 46. 621–646.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, R. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 53–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Z. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1992. The Anthropology of time: Cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, M. A. 2005. Commentary on Everett “Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Piraha”. Current Anthropology 46. 636.Google Scholar
Gonzáles, H. A. 2005. A grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guarani). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Grady, J. 1999. A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs resemblance. In Gibbs, R. & Steen, G. (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 175–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1997. From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world's languages (Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 3). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Hornborg, A. & Hill, J.. In press. Ethnicity in ancient Amazonia. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. 2005. Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 1555–1577.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1929 [1787]. Critique of pure reason. Transl. Smith, N. K.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keyes, C. F. 1975. Buddhist pilgrimage centers and the twelve-year cycle: Northern Thai moral orders in space and time. History of Religions 15(1). 71–89.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leite, Y. de F. 2000. A Gramatica de Anchieta. Ciencia Hoje 28(163). 43–47.Google Scholar
Levine, R. 1997. A geography of time. The temporal misadventures of a social psychologist, or: How every culture keeps time just a little bit differently. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Malotki, E. 1983. Hopi time: A linguistic analysis of the temporal concepts in the Hopi language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. E. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 17. 456–473.Google Scholar
Menéndez, M. A. 1989. O Tenharim: uma contribuiçao ao estudo dos Tupi Centrais. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17. 199–244.Google Scholar
Moore, K. 2011. Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: temporal meanings of FRONT in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 759–776.Google Scholar
Munn, N. D. 1992. The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology 21. 93–123.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. 2008. Nominal tense. Time for further Whorfian adventures? Commentary on Casasanto. Language Learning 58: Suppl. 1. 81–88.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, R. & Sadler, L.. 2004. Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language 80(4). 776–806.Google Scholar
Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E.. 2006. With the future behind them: convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30. 1–49.Google Scholar
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. 1973. Sakhalin Ainu Time Reckoning Man New Series 8(2). 285–299.Google Scholar
Peggion, E. A. 2005. Relações em Perpetuo Desequilibrio: a organização dualista dos povos Kag-wahiva da Amazonia. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Pérez, A. 1990. Time in motion: Grammaticalisation of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics 3. 49–64.Google Scholar
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V. & Dehaene, S.. 2004. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306. 499–503.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. & Tagliamonte, S.. 2000. The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change 11. 315–342.Google Scholar
Postill, J. 2002. Clock and calendar time: A missing anthropological problem. Time and Society 11(2/3). 251–270.Google Scholar
Sampaio, W. 1996. Estudo comparativo entre linguas Tupi-Kawahib. Campinas, SP: University of Campinas PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Sampaio, W. 1999. A referência remissiva número-pessoal nos prefixos verbais da língua uru-eu-uau-uau. Porto Velho: Unpublished manuscript, Federal University of Rondônia.Google Scholar
Sampaio, W. & da Silva, V.. 1998. Os povos indígenas de Rondônia: contribuições para com a compreensão de sua cultura e de sua história, 2nd edn. Porto Velho: UNIR.Google Scholar
Sampaio, W., Sinha, C. & Sinha, V. da Silva. 2009. Mixing and mapping: Motion, path and manner in Amondawa. In Guo, J., Lieven, E., Budwig, N., Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K. & Özçalışkan, Ş. (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the study of language. Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 649–668. London & New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1966. Collected papers III. Studies in phenomenological philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Silva, V. da. 1997. Amondava. Uma historia de perdas. Ouro Preto do O'este: Grupo de Apoio aos Povos Indigenas.Google Scholar
Silva, V. da 2000. Mboxuaxian: uma leitura etnografica da escola Amondawa. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco MA thesis.Google Scholar
Silva Sinha, V. & Sinha, C.. 2007. Linguist List Discussion Post (re 18.1184 Counter to Pirahan-immediacy thesis?). The Linguist List 23 April 2007.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. 1988. Language and representation: A socio-naturalistic approach to human development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Sinha, C. & de López, K. Jensen. 2000. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 17–41.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In Gumperz, J. J. & Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Pick, H. L. Jr. & Acredolo, L. P. (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application, 225–282. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 480–520.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1999. Fictive motion in language and “'ception”. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M. (eds.), Language and space, 211–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, J. 2007. Nominal tense? The meaning of Guarani nominal temporal markers. Language 83. 831–869.Google Scholar
Vickers, A. 1990. Balinese texts and historiography. History and Theory 29(2). 158–178.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whitrow, G. J. 1988. Time in history: Views of time from prehistory to the present day. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1950. An American Indian model of the universe. International Journal of American Linguistics 16. 67–72.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R. 1991. Time among the Maya. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Yu, N. 1998. The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zinken, J. 2010. Temporal frames of reference. In Evans, V. & Chilton, P. (eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions, 479–498. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Zinken, J., Sampaio, W., da Silva Sinha, V. & Sinha, C.. 2005. Space, motion and time in Amondawa: Field manual 2005–6. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. & the SEDSU Project. 2006. Stages in the evolution and development of sign use. In Cangelosi, A., Smith, A. D. M. & Smith, K. (eds.), The evolution of language, 379–387. London: World Scientific.Google Scholar