Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:42:12.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The cognitive poetics of literary resonance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Peter Stockwell
Peter Stockwell*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
*
Correspondence address: School of English Studies, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The application of cognitive science to literary scholarship in the form of a cognitive poetics offers the opportunity for accounting for many features of literary reading that have been rendered only in vague or impressionistic terms in the past. In this paper, an argument for cognitive poetics is made, with a focus on the affective and experiential phenomenon of resonance. This is modelled through cognitivist work on the field of attention and perception, to give a particularly literary-angled approach. The argument is exemplified with reference to a Shakespeare sonnet and then further demonstrated in a poem by Dylan Thomas, where the notion of a lacuna is developed to account for the phenomenon of “felt absence”. The paper concludes with observations on the role of cognitive poetics in relation to cognitive science, literary criticism, and in its own right.

Keywords

attentioncognitive poeticslacunaliteraturenegationpoetryresonanceShakespearestylisticsThomas (Dylan)
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 25 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

le Carré, John. 1999. Single & single. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Carstensen, Kai-Uwe. 2007. Spatio-temporal ontologies and attention. Spatial Cognition and Computation 7(1). 13–32.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Stockwell, Peter (eds.). 2008. The Language and literature reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Currie, Greg. 2004. Arts and minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmott, Catherine, Sanford, Anthony J. & Morrow, Lorna I.. 2006. Capturing the attention of readers? Stylistic and psychological perspectives on the use and effect of text fragmentation in narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics 35(1). 1–30.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine, Sanford, Anthony J. & Dawydiak, Eugene. 2007. Stylistics meets cognitive science: Style in fiction from an interdisciplinary perspective. Style (Special issue on Style in Fiction, edited by Leech, Geoffrey N. & Short, Mick) 41(2). 204–226.Google Scholar
Fricke, Harald. 2007. Response: Theses on literary theory. Journal of Literary Theory 1(1). 192–193.Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text world theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2003. Cognitive science, literature, and the arts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krajco, Kathy. 2008. Lighthouse writing tips website. http://lighthouse-writing-tips.blogspot.com/2008/01/literary-resonance-in-art-of-writing.html [accessed 10 2008].Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral politics, 2nd edn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2006. Don't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mary A. & Enns, James T.. 2005. The edge complex: Implicit memory for figure assignment in shape perception. Perception and Psychophysics 67(4). 727–740.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I. 1993. Attention before and during the decade of the brain. In Meyer, D. E. and Kornblum, S. M. (eds.), Attention and performance, XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience, 340–351. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. H. & Manly, T.. 1999. Sustained attention deficits in time and space. In Humphreys, G. W., Duncan, J. & Triesman, A. (eds.), Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience, 297–310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., Sanford, Alison J. S., Molle, Jo & Emmott, Catherine. 2006. Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes 42(2). 109–130.Google Scholar
Smith, Carter W., Johnson, Scott P. & Spelke, Elizabeth S.. 2003. Motion and edge sensitivity in perception of object unity. Cognitive Psychology 46. 31–64.Google Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth S. 1990. Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science 14. 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard. 1994. Understanding metaphor. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 1994. “To be or not to be a phagocyte”: Procedures of reading metaphors. In Sell, Roger & Verdonk, Peter (eds.), Literature and the new interdisciplinarity: Poetics, linguistics, history, 65–78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002a. Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter 2002b. Miltonic texture and the feeling of reading. In Culpeper, Jonathan & Semino, Elena (eds.), Cognitive stylistics, 73–94. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2003. Surreal figures. In Gavins, Joanna & Steen, Gerard (eds.), Cognitive poetics in practice, 13–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2009. Texture: A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Styles, Elizabeth. 2006. The psychology of attention, 2nd edn. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Dylan. 1936. Twenty-five poems. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Thomas, Dylan. 2004. Dylan Thomas: The Caedmon collection. Audio recording, introduced by Collins, Billy. New York: Caedmon Audio/HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tsur, Reuven. 1992. Toward a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading minds: The study of English in the age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1996. The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar