No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Adriana Gordejuela Senosiáin, Flashbacks in Film: A Cognitive and Multimodal Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2021. 185 pp. ISBN: 978-0-367-72131-2.
Review products
Adriana Gordejuela Senosiáin, Flashbacks in Film: A Cognitive and Multimodal Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2021. 185 pp. ISBN: 978-0-367-72131-2.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 May 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bateman, J. & Schmidt, K. H. (2013). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. & Guerra, M. (2019). The empathic screen: Cinema and neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In Gattis, M. (ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought, 203–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, W. R. (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3–4), 347–58.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nannicelli, T. & Taberham, P. (2014). Cognitive media theory. New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality. In Simpson, J. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics, 668–82. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar