Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:42:15.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive emulation in expert system design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Philip E. Slatter
Philip E. Slatter
Affiliation:
Telecomputing plc. Oxford, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cognitive emulation is an expert system design strategy which attempts to model system performance on human (expert) thinking. Arguments for and against cognitive emulation are reviewed. A major conclusion is that a significant degree of cognitive emulation is an inherent feature of design, but that an unselective application of the strategy is both unrealistic and undesirable. Pragmatic considerations which limit or facilitate the viability of a cognitive emulation approach are discussed. Particular attention is given to the conflict between cognitive emulation and established knowledge engineering objectives, detailed over 12 typical expert system features. The paper suggests circumstances in which a strategy of cognitive emulation is useful.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 28 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Barr, A. and Feigenbaum, E.A. (Eds.) (1981) The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, vol 1. Los Altos, Calif.: William Kaufman.Google Scholar
[2]Barr, A. and Feigenbaum, E.A. (Eds.) (1982) The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, vol 2. Los Altos, Calif.: William Kaufman.Google Scholar
[3]Boden, M.A. (1977) Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
[4]Minsky, M. (1975) A Framework for Representing Knowledge, In Winston, P.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
[5]Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1976) Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search. (1975 ACM Turing Lecture) Communications of the ACM, 19 (3) 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Popper, K.R. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[7]Searle, J. (1984) Brains, Minds and Science. Reith Lectures, BBC publications.Google Scholar
[8]Simons, G.L. (1983) Towards Fifth-Generation Computers. Manchester: NCC Publications.Google Scholar
[9]Sloman, A. (1984) Why We Need Many Knowledge Representation Formalisam. In Bramer, M.A. (Ed.), Research and Development in Expert Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[10]Weizenbaum, J. (1976) Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
[11]Buchanan, B.G. (1982) New Research on Expert Systems. In Hayes, J.E., Michie, D. and Pao, Y.H. (Eds.), Machine Intelligence 10. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
[12]Bramer, M.A. (1984) Expert Systems: The Vision and the Reality, In Bramer, M.A. (Ed.), Research and Development in Expert Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.Google Scholar
[13]Breucker, J.A. and Weilinga, R.A. (1983) Analysis Techniques for Knowledge Based Systems Part 1. Report 1.1 Esprit Project 12 (Memorandum 10 of the Research Project “The Acquisition of Expertise”).Google Scholar
[14]Davies, R. (1982) Expert Systems: Where are we? And where do we go from here? The AI Magazine, 3, 3–22.Google Scholar
[15]Davis, R. and King, J. (1977) An Overview of Production Systems. In Elcock, E. and Michie, D. (Eds.), Machine Intelligence, vol 8. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
[16]Duda, R.O. and Shortliffe, E.H. (1983) Expert Systems Research, Science, 220, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[17]Fox, J. (1982) Expertise in Man and Machine. Paper given at the Colloquium on “Applications of Knowledge-based (or Expert) Systems”. Institute of Electrical Engineers, Savoy Place, London.Google Scholar
[18]Gammack, J.G. and Young, R.M. (1984) Psychological Techniques for Eliciting Knowledge. In Bramer, M.A. (Ed.), Research and Development in Expert Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[19]Gaschig, J., Klahr, P., Pople, H., Shortliffe, E. and Terry, A. (1983) Evaluation of Expert Systems; Issues and Case studies. In Hayes-Roth, F., , F., Waterman, D.A., Lenat, D.B. (Eds.), Building Expert Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
[20]Hayes-Roth, F. (1984) The Knowledge-based Expert System: A Tutorial, Computer, 09 1984, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D.A., and Lenat, D.B. (Eds.) (1983) Building Expert Systems. Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
[22]Johnson, T. (1984) The Commercial Application of Expert System Technology. Knowledge Engineering Review, 1.(1) 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Leith, P. (1983) Heirarchically Structured Production Rules. Computer Journal, 26, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Michie, D. (1980) Expert Systems. Computer Journal, 23, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Michie, D. (1982) The State of the Art in Machine Learning. In Michie, D. (Ed.), Introductory Readings in Expert Systems. London: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
[26]Sparck Jones, K. (1984) Natural Language Interfaces for Expert System In Bramer, M.A. (Ed.), Research and Development in Expert Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[27]Stefik, M., Aikins, J., Balzer, R., Benoit, J., Birnbaum, L., Hayes-Roth, F. and Sacerdoti, E. (1982) The Organization of Expert Systems: A Tutorial. Artificial Intelligence, 18, 135–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28]Welbank, M. (1983) A Review of Knowledge Acquisition Techniques for Expert Systems. Martlesham Consultancy Services, British Telecom Research Labs: Martlesham Heath, Ipswich.Google Scholar
[29]White, A.P. (1984) Inference Deficiences in Rule-based Expert Systems. In Bramer, M.A. (Ed.), Research and Development in Expert Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[30]Young, R.M. (1985) Human Interface Aspects of Expert Systems, in Fox, J. (Ed.), State of the Art Report in Expert Systems. Pergamon Infotech, 1984.Google Scholar
[31]Buchanan, B.G. and Feigenbaum, E.A. (1978) DENDRAL and Meta-DENDRAL; Their Application Dimension. Artificial Intelligence, 11, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32]Davies, R., Buchanan, B.G. and Shortliffe, E. (1977) Production Rules as a Representation for a Knowledge-based Consultation Program. Artificial Intelligence, 8, 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33]Duda, R.O., Gaschnig, J.G. and Hart, R.E. (1979) Model Design in the PROSPECTOR Consultant System for Mineral Exploration. In Michie, D. (Ed.) Expert Systems in the Micro-electronic Age. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
[34]Fox, J., Barber, D. and Bardhan, K.D. (1980) Alternatives to Bayes? A Quantitative Comparison with Rule-based Diagnosis. Methods of Information in Medicine, 19, 210–215.Google Scholar
[35]McDermott, J. (1982) A Rule-Based Configurer of Computer Systems. Artificial Intelligence, 19, 39–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36]Michalski, R.S. and Chilausky, R.L. (1980) Knowledge Acquisition by Encoding Expert Rules Versus Computer Induction From Examples: A Case Study Invoving Soybean Pathology. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 12, 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37]Anderson, J.R. (1976) Language, Memory and Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[38]Anderson, J.R. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harward.Google Scholar
[39]Anderson, J.R. (1984) Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, 23, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40]Anderson, J.R. and Bower, G.H. (1983) Human Associative Memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston.Google Scholar
[41]Baddeley, A.D. (1976) The Psychology of Memory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
[42]Barslou, L.W. and Bower, G.H. (1984) Discrimination Nets as Psychological Models, Cognitive Science, 8, 1–26.Google Scholar
[43]Bartlett, F.C. (1932) Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[44]Elio, R. and Anderson, J.R. (1981) Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 397–417.Google Scholar
[45]Garner, W.R.Interaction of Stimulus Dimensions in Concept and Choice Processes. Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 98–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[46]Hunt, E.B., Marin, J. and Stone, P.J. (1966) Experiments in Induction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
[47]Jeffries, R., Turner, A., Polson, P., and Atwood, M. (1981) The Processes Involved in Designing Software. In Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[48]Johnson, P.E., Duran, A.S., Hassebrock, F., Moller, J., Prietula, M., Feltovich, P.J., and Swanson, D.B. (1981) Expertise and Error in Diagnostic Reasoning. Cognitive Science, 5, 235–283.Google Scholar
[49]Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982) Thinking as a Skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 34A, 1–29.Google Scholar
[50]Johnson-Laird, P.N. and Wason, P.C. (Eds.) (1977) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[51]Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[52]Kuipers, B. and Kassirer, J.P. (1984) Causal Reasoning in Medicine: Analysis of a Protocol. Cognitive Science, 8, 363.385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[53]McCelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981) An Interactive Model of Contextual Effects in Letter Perception: Pt 1, An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[54]Miller, G. A. (1956) The Magical Number Seven. Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity to Process Information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[55]Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
[56]Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1972) Human Problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
[57]Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D. (1977) Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[58]Norman, D.A. (1981) Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science. In Norman, D.A. (Ed.), Perspectives on Cognitive Science, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[59]Pinker, S. (1984) Visual Cognition: An Introduction. Cognition, 18, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[60]Pople, H. (1977) The Formation of Composite Hypotheses in Diagnostic Problem Solving — An Exercise in Synthetic Reasoning. International Joint Conferences on AI 5, 1030–1037.Google Scholar
[61]Posner, M.I. and Keele, W.W. (1970) Retention of Abstract Ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[62]Reder, L.M. and Anderson, J.R. (1980) A Partial Resolution of the Paradox of Interference: The Role of Integrating Knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 447–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[63]Rumelhart, D.E. and Norman, D.A. (1978) Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning, In Cotton, J.W. and Klatzky, R. (Eds.), Semantic Factors in Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[64]Rumelhart, D.E. and Norman, D.A. (1981) Analogical Processes in Learning. In Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[65]Shiffrin, R.M. and Schneider, W. (1977) Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing. II Perceptual Learning, Automatic Attending and a General Theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[66]Slack, J.M. (1984) Cognitive Science Research. In O'Shea, T. and Eisenstadt, M. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence: Tools, Techniques, and Applications. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
[67]Wason, P.C. and Evans, J. St B.T. (1975) Dual Processes in Reasoning? Cognition, 3, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[68]Young, R.M. (1979) Production Systems for Modelling Human Cognition. In Michie, D. (Ed.), Expert Systems in The Micro-electronic Age. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
[69]Young, R.M. and O'Shea, T. (1981) Errors in Children's Subtraction. Cognitive Science, 5, 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[70]Adelson, B. (1984) When Novices Surpass Experts: The Difficulty of a Task May Increase With Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and Cognition, 10, 483–495.Google Scholar
[71]Anderson, J.R. (1983) Acquisition of Proof skills in Geometry. In Carbonell, J.G., Michalski, R. and Mitchell, T. (Eds.), Machine Learnig, An Artificial Intelligence Approach, San Francisco: Tioga.Google Scholar
[72]Anderson, J.R., Farrell, R. and Sauers, R. (1984) Learning to Program in Lisp. Cognitive Science, 8, 87–129.Google Scholar
[73]Arkes, H.R. and Freedman, M.R. (1984) A Demonstration of the Cost and Benefits of Memory. Memory and Cognition, 12, 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[74]Berry, D.C. and Broadbent, D.E. (1984) On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[75]Chase, W.O. and Ericsson, K.A. (1982) Skill and Working Memory. In Bower, G.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol 16. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
[76]Chase, W.G. and Simon, H.A. (1973) Perception in Chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[77]Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. and Glaser, R. (1981) Categorization and Representation of Physics problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[78]Eisenstadt, M. and Kareev, Y. (1975) Aspects of Human Problem Solving: The Use of Internal Representations. In Norman, D.A. and Rumelhart, D.E. (Eds.), Explorations of Cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
[79]Fox, J. (1980) Making Decisions Under the Influence of Memory. Psychological Review, 87, 190–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[80]Larkin, J.H. (1981) Enriching Formal Knowledge: A Model for Learning to Solve Textbook Problems. In Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[81]Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P. and Simon, H.A. (1980) Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems. Science, 208, 1335–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[82]Lewis, C. (1981) Skills in Algebra, In Anderson, J.R. (Ed.), Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
[83]Medin, D.L., Altom, M.W., Edelson, S.M. and Freko, D. (1982) Correlated Symptoms and Simulated Medical Classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 8, 37–50.Google ScholarPubMed
[84]Murphy, G.L. and Wright, J.C. (1984) Changes in Conceptual Structure with Expertise: Differences Between Real-World Experts and Novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 144–155.Google Scholar
[85]Simon, H.A. and Gilmartin, K. (1973) A Simulation of Memory for Chess Positions. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[86]Smith, E.E., Adams, N. and Schorr, D. (1978) Fact Retrieval and the Paradox of Interference. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 438.464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar