Hostname: page-component-599cfd5f84-jr95t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T05:33:05.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An upper-level functional design ontology to support knowledge management in SME-based E-Manufacturing of mechanical products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Alessandro Mosca ,
Matteo Palmonari  and
Fabio Sartori
Alessandro Mosca
Affiliation:
Complex Systems and Artificial Intelligence Research Centre, University of Milan—Bicocca, viale Sarca, 336, 20126 Milan, Italy; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Matteo Palmonari
Affiliation:
Complex Systems and Artificial Intelligence Research Centre, University of Milan—Bicocca, viale Sarca, 336, 20126 Milan, Italy; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Fabio Sartori
Affiliation:
Complex Systems and Artificial Intelligence Research Centre, University of Milan—Bicocca, viale Sarca, 336, 20126 Milan, Italy; e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual and computational framework for supporting the development of knowledge management systems based on ontology design and implementation. This framework supports enterprises involved in the design and manufacturing of complex mechanical products: in particular, we focus our attention on a network of small/medium Italian enterprises that collaborates in the production of a supermotard bike called Terra Modena 198. Starting from some theoretical considerations about the role of ontologies in engineering design, this paper reflects on the difficulties that arise when knowledge is distributed, and misunderstanding and communication problems among partners could easily lead to errors in the final product.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 24 , Special Issue 3: Software and system engineering – part 2 , September 2009 , pp. 265 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aamodt, A., Plaza, E. 1994. Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D. L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. F. (eds). 2003. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bandini, S., Colombo, G., Sartori, F. 2005. Towards the integration of ontologies and SA-Nets to manage design and engineering core knowledge. In Proceedings of ONTOSE 2005, CEUR Workshop 163, Sicilia M. A., Sanchez-Alonso, S., Garcia-Barriocanal, E. & Cuadrado-Gallego, J. (eds), June 9–10. Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar
Bandini, S., Mereghetti, P., Merino, E., Sartori, F. 2007. Case-based support to small-medium enterprises: the symphony project. In Proceedings of AI*IA 2007, Basili, R. & Pazienza, M. T. (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4733, 483–494. Springer.Google Scholar
Bandini, S., Sartori, F. 2006. Industrial mechanical design: the IDS case study. In Design Computing and Cognition 2006 – Proceedings, Gero, J. (eds), June 10–12, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Springer-Verlag, 141–160.Google Scholar
Bonomi, A., Mantegari, G., Vizzari, G. 2006. A framework for ontological description of archaeological scientific publications. In Proceedings of SWAP 2006, Pisa, Italy, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 201, Tumarello, G., Bouquet, P. & Signore, O. (eds). CEUR.Google Scholar
Bonomi, A., Mosca, A., Palmonari, M., Vizzari, G. 2007. NavEditOW—A system for navigating, editing and querying ontologies through the web. In KES 2007, Apolloni, B., Howlett R. J. & Jain, L. C. (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4694, 686–694. Springer.Google Scholar
Bouquet, P., Don, V., Serafini, A. 2002. ConTeXtualized local ontology specification via ctxml. In Proceedings of AAAI workshop on Meaning Negotiation, Edmonton Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Bracewell, R. H.,, Wallace, K. M. 2001. Designing a representation to support function-means based synthesis of mechanical design solutions. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’01), 21–23 August, Glasgow, UK.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R., Christensen, C., Wheelwright, S. 1996. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B. 1990. Design problem solving: a task analysis. AI Magazine 11(4), 59–71.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R. 2000. Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers 16(3–4), 162–177.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., Benjamins, V. R. 1999. What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
Chiang, W. C., Pennathur, A., Mital, A. 2001. Designing and manufacturing consumer products for functionality: a literature review of current function definitions and design support tools. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 12(6), 430–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, G., Mosca, A., Sartori, F. 2007. Towards the design of intelligent CAD systems: an ontological approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics 22(2), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y. M. 2002. Function and behaviour representation in conceptual mechanical design. Artificial intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 16, 343–362.Google Scholar
Gero, J. S. 1990. Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26–36.Google Scholar
Gero, J. S., Kannengiesser, U. 2003. Function-behaviour-structure: a model for social situated agents. In IJCAI 2003, 101–107.Google Scholar
Gero, J., Maher, L. M. 1997. A framework for research in Design computing. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (ECAADE 97), Martens, B., Linzer, H. & Voigt, A. (eds), September 17–20, Vienna, Österreichischer Kunst- und Kulturverlag.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Singh, H. 1998. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly 43(4), 781–814.Google Scholar
Handzic, M. 2006. Knowledge management in SMEs—practical guidelines. CACCI Journal 1, 1–11. http://www.cacci.org.tw/Journal/2006%20Vol%201/Handzic-mar2004.pdf.Google Scholar
Jin, L., Wen, Z., Oraifige, I. A. 2007. Distributed VR for collaborative design and manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Visualization (July 04–06, 2007). IEEE Computer Society, 792–797.Google Scholar
Kim Chung, Y. R., Tibben, W. 2006. Understanding the Adoption of Clusters by SMEs using Innovation Theory. In Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT 2006), 21–23 June, Singapore 1, 389–393.Google Scholar
Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K., Mizoguchi, R. 2002. A functional concept ontology and its application to automatic identification of functional structures. Advanced Engineering Informatics 16(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, Y., Washio, N., Ookubo, M., Koji, Y., Sasajima, M., Tafakuji, S., Mizoguchi, R. 2006. Towards a reference ontology of functionality for interoperable annotation for engineering documents. In Proceedings of Posters and Demos of the 3rd European Semantic Web Conference 2006 (ESWC 2006), 11–14 June, Budva, Montenegro, 75–76.Google Scholar
Knublauch, H., Musen, M. A., Rector, A. L. 2004. Editing description logic ontologies with the Protégé OWL plugin. In International Workshop on Description Logics—Proceedings, CEUR WS 104, Whistler, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
Lee, J. 2003. E-manufacturing—fundamental, tools and transformation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 19(6), 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, L., Strandholm, K., Steensma, H. K., Weaver, K. M. 2002. The moderating effect of national culture on the relationships between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic alliance portfolio extensiveness. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 26(4), 145–160.Google Scholar
Mason, C., Castleman, T., Parker, C. 2004. Knowledge management for SME-based regional clusters. In Proceedings of the 12th CollECTeR Conference on Electronic Commerce, 7–8 May, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmonari, M., Viscusi, G., Batini, C. 2008. A semantic repository approach to improve the government to business relationship. Data Knowledge Engineering 65(3), 485–511.Google Scholar
Ram, S., Shankaranarayanan, G. 1999. Modeling and navigation of large information spaces: a semantics based approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 1–11.Google Scholar
Soares, A. L., Simoes, D., Silva, M., Madureira, R. 2006. Developing enterprise sponsored virtual communities: the case of a SME’s knowledge community. In OTM Workshops 2006, Meersman, R., Tari, Z. & Herrero, P. (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4277, 269–278. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stahovich, T. F., Davis, R., Shrobe, H. 1993. An ontology for mechanical devices. In AAAI-93 Working Notes, Reasoning About Function, 137–140.Google Scholar
Sugumaran, V., Storey, V. C. 2002. Ontologies for conceptual modeling: their creation, use, and management. Data Knowledge Engineering 42(3), 251–271.Google Scholar
Sverrisson, A. 2000. Technological development in networked SME clusters. In Private Sector Promotion in Developing Countries, Tuulikki, P. (ed.), University of Helsinki, Institute of Development Studies, Policy Papers 1/2000.Google Scholar
Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I. 2006. FaCT++ description logic reasoner: system description. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2006), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4130, 292–297. Springer.Google Scholar
Umeda, Y., Ishii, M., Yoshioka, M., Shimomura, Y., Tomiyama, T. 1996. Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T. 1997. Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert 12(2), 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar