Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:00:47.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Principles of Justice, Primary Goods and Categories of Right: Rawls and Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

Paul Guyer
Paul Guyer*
Affiliation:
Brown University
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Rawls based his theory of justice, in the work of that name, on a ‘Kantian interpretation’ of the status of human beings as ‘free and equal’ persons. In his subsequent, ‘political rather than metaphysical’ expositions of his theory, the conception of citizens of democracies as ‘free and equal’ persons retained its foundational role. But Rawls appealed only to Kant’s moral philosophy, never to Kant’s own political philosophy as expounded in his 1797 Doctrine of Right in the Metaphysics of Morals. I argue here that the structure of Kant’s political philosophy, with its categories of the innate right to freedom, private acquired right and public right, can clarify the relationship between Rawls’s two principles of justice and his scheme of basic liberties and primary goods.

Keywords

KantRawlsUniversal Principle of Rightprinciples of justiceinnate rightacquired rightprimary goodsbasic libertiesdifference principle
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant & Rawls , December 2018 , pp. 581 - 613
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenwall, Gottfried (1781) Ius Naturae in usum auditorum. Edition septima emendatior. Göttingen: Bossiegel.Google Scholar
Achenwall, Gottfried and Pütter, Stefan (1995) Anfangsgründe des Naturrechts. Ed. and tr. Jan Schröder. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, Julius (1954) ‘Kant und das 20. Jahrhundert’. Studium Generale, 7, 513–524.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel (2003) ‘Congruence and the Good of Justice’. In Samuel Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 277–315.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000a) ‘Kantian Foundations for Liberalism’. In Paul Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), ch. 7, pp. 235–261.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000b) ‘Life, Liberty, and Property, Rawls and Kant’. In Paul Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), ch. 8, pp. 262–286.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2002) ‘Kant’s Deductions of the Principles of Right’. In Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 23–64, reprinted in Paul Guyer, Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005), pp. 198–242.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006) ‘The Possibility of Perpetual Peace’. In Luigi Caranti (ed.), Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays (Rome: LUISS University Press), pp. 161–181.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2009) ‘The Crooked Timber of Humankind’. In Amelie Rorty and James Schmidt (eds), Kant’s ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 129–149.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016) ‘The Twofold Morality of Recht: Once More unto the Breach’. Kant-Studien, 107, 34–63.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Tr. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Lectures on Ethics. Ed. Peter Heath and J.B. Schneewind, tr. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Tr. John Ladd. 2nd edn. Indianapolis and Cambridgs: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2005) Notes and Fragments. Ed. Paul Guyer, tr. Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Günter Zöller and Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich (1767) Recht der Natur. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde.Google Scholar
Pallikkathayil, Japa (2010) ‘Deriving Morality from Politics: Rethinking the Formula of Humanity’. Ethics, 121, 116–147.Google Scholar
Pallikkathayil, Japa (2016) ‘Neither Perfectionism not Political Liberalism’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 44, 171–196.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1980) ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’. In John Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. Samuel Freeman (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1999b), pp. 303–58.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1983) ‘The Basic Liberties and their Priority’ (Tanner Lectures on Human Value, April, 1981). In Sterling McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Value, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 3–87. Reprinted as ch. 8 of John Rawls, Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1985) ‘Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical’. In John Rawls, Collected Papers, ed. Samuel Freeman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999b), pp. 388–414.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999a) A Theory of Justice. Rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999b) Collected Papers, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Barbara Herman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Erin Kelly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2007) Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar