Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:16:08.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Objective Validity’ and ‘Objective Reality’ in Kant's B-deduction of the Categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Aaron Bunch
Aaron Bunch
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Like Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, we now have both an A- and a substantially revised B-edition of Henry Allison's commentary to and defence of that work: Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (Allison 1983, 2004). Unlike Kant's Critique, however, Allison's first edition is unlikely to persist as an occasional rival to the second, since reviewers rightly consider the second to have superseded the landmark scholarship of the first. Nevertheless, before Allison's first edition is entirely supplanted, I would like to save a neglected insight from its treatment of the B-deduction that is not retained in the second edition.

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 67 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. (2004) Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense, second revised edition (New Haven: Yale University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1986) Reflections on the B-deduction, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 25 Supplement, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1983) Kant's Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E., Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen (2007) Debating Allison on transcendental idealism, Kantian Review, 12–2, 1–39.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (1984) Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, Topoi, 3, 181–5.Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard (1989) Matter in Mind: A Study of Kant's Transcendental Deduction (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Aquila, Richard (1987) Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, International Studies in Philosophy, 19, 61–2.Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1992a) Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Vierter Teil, Kant-Studien, 83, 185–207.Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1992b) Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Dritter Teil, Kant-Studien, 83, 60–83.Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1991a) Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Zweiter Teil, Kant-Studien, 82, 436–55.Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1991b) Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Erster Teil, Kant-Studien, 82, 329–48.Google Scholar
Buroker, Jill (1986) Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, Nous, 20–4, 577–9.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckhart (1985), Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, The Journal of Philosophy, 82–12, 734–8.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006) Kant (London and New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1989) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin ([1990] 1997) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans. Richard, Taft (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1969) The proof-structure of Kant's transcendental deduction, Review of Metaphysics, 22, 640–59.Google Scholar
Hermann, Horst (1961) Das Problem der objektiven Realität bei Kant (Mainz: Ditters Bürodienst).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1995-) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1910-) Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Georg Reimer).Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf (1972) Kant's use of the notions ‘objective reality’ and ‘objective validity’, Kant-Studien, 63, 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert (1986) Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, Kant-Studien, 77, 365–71.Google Scholar
Rousett, Bernard (1967) La Doctrine kantienne de l'objectivité (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1894) Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, in Sämtliche, Werke, vol. 4 (Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung Nachfolger GmbH).Google Scholar
Sherover, Charles (1982) Two kinds of transcendental objectivity: their differentiation, in Essays on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1995) The Bounds of Sense (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Wagner, Hans (1967) Realitas objectiva (Descartes - Kant), Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 21, 325–40.Google Scholar
Walsh, W. H. (1984) Review of Henry Allison, Kant's Transcendental Idealism, Philosophical Books, 25, 207–9.Google Scholar
Zöller, Günter (1984) Theoretische Gegenstandsbeziehung bei Kant (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar