Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:10:39.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Importance of Politeness in Kant's Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Patrick Frierson
Patrick Frierson
Affiliation:
Whitman College, Walla Walla
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1784), Kant explains that ethics, like physics, ‘will have its empirical part, but it will also have a rational part, … though here [in ethics] the empirical part might be given the special name practical anthropology’ (4: 388). In the Groundwork, Kant suggests that anthropology, or the ‘power of judgment sharpened by experience’, has two roles, ‘to distinguish in what cases [moral laws] are applicable’ and ‘to gain for [moral laws] access to the human will’ (4: 389). Twelve years later, the first function, of applying the categorical imperative to specifically human situations, is incorporated into Kant's Metaphysics of Morals (1797).

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 9 , March 2005 , pp. 105 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Gold, Sharon (2001) Unnecessary Evil (New York: SUNY Press).Google Scholar
Brender, Natalie (1998) ‘Keeping up appearances: Kantian moral agency and the fragility of respect’, presented at the NAKS session of the Pacific APA.Google Scholar
Brender, Natalie (1997) ‘Precarious positions: aspects of Kantian moral agency’, doctoral dissertation (Maryland: Johns Hopkins University).Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick, (2003) Freedom and Anthropology in Kant's Moral Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2000) ‘Kant on affects and passions’, presented at the eastern division of the American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle (2001) Kant's Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993) Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays in Aesthetics and Morality (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1975) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. and Nidditch, P. H. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3rd edn).Google Scholar
Kneller, Jane (1993) ‘Discipline and silence: women and imagination in Kant's theory of taste’, in Hein, Hilde and Korsmeyer, Carolyn (eds), Aesthetics in Feminist Perspective (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Louden, Robert (2000) Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf (1986) ‘Introduction, notes, and translation of Kant's “Concerning sensory illusion and poetic fiction”’ in Beck, Lewis White (ed.) Kant's Latin Writings (Peter Lang Publishing).Google Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas (1999) Kant's Conception of Moral Character: The ‘Critical’ Link of Morality, Anthropology, and Reflective Judgment (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Modern Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May (1997) Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld (1996) The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997a) Making a Necessity of Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997b) ‘Kantian virtue: priggish or passional’, Reath, in Andrews, Herman, Barbara and Korsgaard, Christine (eds), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sorenson, Kelly (2002) ‘Kant's taxonomy of the emotions’, Kantian Review, 6, 109–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velkley, Richard Lee (1978) ‘Kant as philosopher of theodicy’, doctoral dissertation (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard Lee (1989) Freedom and the End of Reason (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar