Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:15:48.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mario Caimi, Kant’s B Deduction, trans. Maria del Carmen Caimi. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014. Pp. 160 ISBN 9781443865371 (hbk) £41.99

Review products

Mario Caimi, Kant’s B Deduction, trans. Maria del Carmen Caimi. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014. Pp. 160 ISBN 9781443865371 (hbk) £41.99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Thomas Land*
Affiliation:
Ryerson University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2015) Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1991) ‘Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht’. Kant-Studien, 82, 329348 and 436–55.Google Scholar
Baumanns, Peter (1992) ‘Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B): Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht,’. Kant-Studien, 83, 6083 and 185–207.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jonathan (1966) Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buroker, Jill (2011) Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’: An Introduction . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carl, Wolfgang (1992) Die transzendentale Deduktion der Kategorien in der ersten Auflage der Kritik der reinen Vernunft: Ein Kommentar. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sebastian (1999) Routledge Philosophy Guide Book to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gomes, Anil (2010) ‘Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?’. Kantian Review, 15, 118137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1969) ‘The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’. Review of Metaphysics, 22, 640659.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman (1923) A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John (2009) ‘Hegel’s Idealism as a Radicalization of Kant’. In Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 6989.Google Scholar
O’Shea, James (2012) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction and Interpretation. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Paton, Herbert J. (1936) Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience: A Commentary on the First Half of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Jay (2005) Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2016) Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Peter (1966) The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar