Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:37:56.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Political Legacy: Replies to Sangiovanni, Williams and Guyer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2019

Luigi Caranti
Luigi Caranti*
Affiliation:
University of Catania
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following are my responses to a set of extremely insightful, hence pressing, criticisms of my book Kant’s Political Legacy (2017). I wish to express my gratitude to Andrea Sangiovanni, Howard Williams and Paul Guyer for their comments, and to the editors of Kantian Review for reserving this space in the journal to discuss my ideas.

Type
Author Meets
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 289 - 305
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, H. (1990) Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. (2010) ‘The Egalitarianism of Human Rights’. Ethics, 120(4), 679–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranti, L. (2017) Kant’s Political Legacy: Human Rights, Peace, Progress. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (2016) ‘Kant’s Politics of Freedom’. Ratio Juris, 29(3), 427–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Gregor, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar