Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:48:42.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Contextualism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2018

Katrin Flikschuh
Katrin Flikschuh*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on David Velleman’s recent work on moral relativism to argue that Kant’s account of moral judgement is best read in a contextualist manner. More specifically, I argue that while for Kant the form of moral judgement is invariant, substantive moral judgements are nonetheless context-dependent. The same form of moral willing can give rise to divergent substantive judgements. To some limited extent, Kantian contextualism is a development out of Rawlsian constructivism. Yet while for constructivists the primary concern is with the derivation of generally valid principles of morality, Velleman’s Kant-inspired form of moral relativism demonstrates the indispensability to a Kantian approach of indexical reasons for action. I argue in turn that Velleman’s focus on the indexical nature of reasons for action must be supplemented by an account of agential reflexivity. The latter divides Kantian contextualism from Kantian relativism.

Keywords

KantRawlsVellemancontextualismreasons for actionmoral judgementnorm diversity
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant & Rawls , December 2018 , pp. 555 - 579
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameriks, Karl (2003) ‘On Two Non-Realist Interpretations of Kant’s Ethics’. In Karl Ameriks, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 263–282.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2012) ‘Is Practical Justification in Kant Ultimately Dogmatic?’. In Karl Ameriks, Kant’s Elliptical Path (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 162–182.Google Scholar
Berman, Russell (1998) Enlightenment or Empire? Colonial Discourse in German Culture. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Brink, David (1987) ‘Rawlsian Constructivism in Moral Theory’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17, 71–90.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2006) ‘Contractualism, Root and Branch: A Review Essay ’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34, 193–214.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2009) ‘The Kingdom of Ends: Metaphysical, Not Political’. In Jens Timmermann (ed.), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 119–139.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2010) ‘Justice without Virtue’. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2017a) What is Orientation in Global Thinking? A Kantian Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2017b) ‘Kant’s Nomads: Encountering Strangers’. Con-Textos Kantianos, 5, 346–368.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. (1989) ‘Kantian Constructivism in Ethics’. Ethics, 99, 752–770.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. Jr. (1992) ‘Kantian Pluralism’. Ethics, 102, 743–762.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2012) Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996) ‘The Reasons we Can Share: An Attack on the Distinction between Agent-Relative and Agent-Neutral Reasons’. In Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 275–310.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2008) ‘Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth Century Moral Philosophy’. In Christine Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 302–327.Google Scholar
Lear, Jonathan (1999) ‘Transcendental Anthropology’. In Lear, Open Minded: Working out the Logic of the Soul (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 247–281.Google Scholar
Lenman, James, and Yonathan, Shemmer, eds (2013) Constructivism in Practical Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milo, Ronald (1995) ‘Contractarian Constructivism’. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 181–204.Google Scholar
Moore, Adrian (2006) ‘Maxims and Thick Ethical Concepts’, Ratio, XIX, 129–147.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar (2014) ‘Productive Resistance in Kant’s Political Thought: Domination, Counter-Domination, and Global Unsocial Sociability’. In Katrin Flikschuh and Lea Ypi (eds), Kant and Colonialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 68–98.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1989) Constructions of Reason: Explorations in Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1996) Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2003) ‘Constructivism in Rawls and Kant’. In Samuel Freeman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 347–367.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1980) ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’. Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 515–576.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1989) ‘Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy’. In Eckard Foerster (ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), pp. 81–113.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Barbara Herman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon (2013) ‘Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructions about Practical Reason’. In James Lenman and Yonathan Shemmer (eds), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 40–59.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2013) ‘Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant’s Ethical Theory’. Archiv fur Geschichteder Philosophie, 95, 36–64.Google Scholar
Velleman, David (2006) ‘The Voice of Conscience’. In David Velleman, Self to Self: Selected Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 110–128.Google Scholar
Velleman, David (2009) How we Get Along. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, David (2013) Foundations for Moral Relativism. Cambridge: Open Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1972) Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981) ‘The Truth in Relativism’. In Bernard Williams, Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 132–143.Google Scholar