Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:06:39.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

James J. DiCenso, Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 Pp. 275 ISBN 9781107009349 (hbk) US $99.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Lawrence Pasternack*
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Denis, L. (2005) ‘Autonomy and the Highest Good’. Kantian Review, 10, 3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidovich, A. (1993) ‘Kant's Theological Constructivism’. Harvard Theological Review, 86(3), 323351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidovich, A. (1994) Religion as a Province of Meaning: The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Hare, J. (1996) The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Michalson, G. (1990) Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, L. (2011) ‘The Development and Scope of Kantian Belief: The Highest Good, the Practical Postulates, and the Fact of Reason’. Kant-Studien, 102(3), 290315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (1991) ‘Conundrums in Kant's Rational Religion’. In P. J. Rossi and M. J. Wreen (eds), Kant's Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered ( Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), 4053.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. (1998) ‘Is it Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant?, Modern Theology, 14(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar