Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:35:55.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humanity as an Idea, as an Ideal, and as an End in Itself

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2013

Richard Dean
Richard Dean*
Affiliation:
California State University Los Angeles Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kant emphasizes that moral philosophy must be divided into two parts, a ‘purely rational’ metaphysics of morals, and an empirical application to individuals, which Kant calls ‘moral anthropology’. But Kant gives humanity (die Menschheit) a prominent role even in the purely rational part of ethics – for example, one formulation of the categorical imperative is a demand to treat humanity as an end in itself. This paper argues that the only concepts of humanity suited to play such a role are the rational idea of humanity, and the rational ideal derived from this idea, which Kant discusses in Critique of Practical Reason and other texts.

Keywords

end in itselfhumanityideaidealKantmetaphysics of morals
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , July 2013 , pp. 171 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dean, Richard (2006) The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (2010) ‘Humanity, Obligation, and the Good Will: An Argument Against Dean's Interpretation of Humanity’. Kantian Review, 15, 118–141.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E Jr (1992) Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997a) Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997b) Lectures on Ethics, trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998a) Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998b) Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone, ed. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Thomas E. Hill, Jr. and Arnulf Zweig. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Lectures on Pedagogy, trans. Robert Louden, in Anthropology, History, and Education, ed. Günter Zöller and Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1969) Monadology. In Philosophical Papers and Letters, trans. Leroy Loemker, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1976) Vernünftige Gedancken von der Menschen Tun und Lassen zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseligkeit. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian (1983) Vernünftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch alle Dingen Überhaupt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar