Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:55:11.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geist and Communication in Kant's Theory of Aesthetic Ideas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Charles DeBord
Charles DeBord*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his Critique of the Power of Judgement, Kant explicates the creation of works of fine art (schöne Kunst) in terms of aesthetic ideas. His analysis of aesthetic ideas claims that they are not concepts (Begriffe) and are therefore not definable or describable in determinate language. Nevertheless, Kant claims that aesthetic ideas are communicable via spirit (Geist), a special mental ability he associates with artistic genius. This paper argues that Kant's notion of Geist is central to his analysis of fine art's expressive power. The notion of Geist constitutes a conceptual link between Kant's aesthetic theory and that of G. W. F. Hegel, for whose analysis Geist is the subject.

Keywords

aesthetic ideasaestheticsGerman idealismHegelKantphilosophy of artspirit
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , 08 June 2012 , pp. 177 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cassirer, H. W. (1938) Commentary on Kant's Critique of Judgment. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Coleman, Francis X. J. (1974) The Harmony of Reason: A Study in Kant's Aesthetic. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Donald W. (1974) Kant's Aesthetic Theory. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Donald W (1982/2003) ‘Kant's Theory of Creative Imagination’. In Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer (eds), Essays in Kant's Aesthetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press); repr. in Paul Guyer (ed.), Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), pp. 143–170.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975) Lectures on Fine Art (1823, 1826, 1828–9). Trans. T. M. Knox. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment (1790). Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason (1781/1787). Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal, Salim (1986) Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. (1990) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth F. (2008) The Problem of Free Harmony in Kant's Aesthetics. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte (1991/2003) ‘Artistic Genius and the Question of Creativity’. In Gerhard Funke (ed.), Akten des 7. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, vol. 2. Bonn: Bouvier. Repr. in Paul Guyer (ed.), Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
Zuidervaart, Lambert (1984/2003) ‘ “Aesthetic Ideas” and the Role of Art in Kant's Ethical Hermeneutics’. In Cecile Cloutier and Calvin Seervald (eds), Opuscula Aesthetica Nostra. Edmonton, Canada: 1984. Repr. in Paul Guyer (ed.), Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), pp. 199–208.Google Scholar