Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:40:39.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apriority, Metaphysics, and Empirical Content in Kant's Theory of Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

Sebastian Rand
Sebastian Rand*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses problems associated with the role of the empirical concept of matter in Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, offering an interpretation emphasizing two points consistently neglected in the secondary literature: the distinction between logical and real essence, and Kant's claim that motion must be represented in pure intuition by static geometrical figures. I conclude that special metaphysics cannot achieve its stated and systematically justified goal of discovering the real essence of matter, but that Kant requires this failure for his larger philosophical presentation of the dialectic that ‘irremediably attaches to human reason’ (A298/B354).

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , 27 January 2012 , pp. 109 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. Lanier (2005) ‘The Wolffian Paradigm and its Discontents: Kant's Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 87, 22–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd (1969) Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, Konrad (1985) Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori: Ein Problem der Tranzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992) Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael (2005) ‘Kant on Science and Experience’. In E. O'Neill (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Mater, and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2006) Kant. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986) Wissenschaft der Logik I. In E. Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel (eds), Werke (Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp), vol. 5.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1902ff.) Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter. (Cited by volume and page number, except for the first Critique, cited in the standard A/B pagination.).Google Scholar
Langton, Rae (1998) Kantian Humility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plaaß, Peter (1994) Kant's Theory of Natural Science. Trans. A. E. Miller and M. G. Miller. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2001) Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft: Ein Kritischer Kommentar. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2002) ‘ “Fabricating a World in Accordance with Mere Fantasy … ”? The Origins of Kant's Critical Theory of Matter’. Review of Metaphysics, 56, 61–97.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2006) ‘Kant's Critical Concept of Motion’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 44(4), 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009) Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Daniel (2001) Reality and Impenetrability in Kant's Philosophy of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar