Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T01:48:52.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analytic Cognition in Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2024

Michael Yuen*
Affiliation:
New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Kant refers to analytic cognition in several prominent places. The prevailing wisdom, however, denies the possibility of analytic cognition within his theory of cognition. I shall argue that this is mistaken. I show that we can account for analytic cognition’s possibility by appealing to variants of the more familiar conditions on the cognition of objects. I also highlight analytic cognition’s connection to insight and analytic knowledge. In the process, I provide a fuller account of Kant’s view of our mental lives than has been typically acknowledged.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allais, Lucy (2009) ‘Kant, non-conceptual content and the representation of space’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47(3), 383413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2015) Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, Lucy (2016) ‘Conceptualism and nonconceptualism in Kant: a survey of the recent debate’. In Schulting, Dennis (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 125.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007) ‘Belief in Kant’. Philosophical Review, 116(3), 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2014) ‘Modal motivations for noumenal ignorance: knowledge, cognition, and coherence’. Kant-Studien, 105(4), 573–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1992) Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge MA, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gomes, Anil, and Stephenson, Andrew (2016) ‘On the relation of intuition to cognition’. In Schulting, Dennis (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 5379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne, Stefanie (2011) ‘Is there a gap in Kant’s B deduction?’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19(3), 465–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, Hanna (2001) Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hebbeler, James (2018) ‘Kant on reason in the sciences’. In Muchnik, Pablo and Thorndike, Oliver (eds.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 5 (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), 93129.Google Scholar
Heide, Dai (2020) ‘A mereological argument for the non-spatiotemporality of things in themselves’. European Journal of Philosophy, 28(1), 4876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Desmond (2020) ‘Kant’s philosophy of mathematics. Volume 1: the critical philosophy and its roots’. In Posy, Carl and Rechter, Ofra (eds), Kant and the Character of Mathematical Inference (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 126–54.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900) Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Koniglich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (and successors). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (and predecessors).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2013) ‘The objects and the formal truth of Kantian analytic judgements’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 30(2), 177–93.Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk (1990) ‘Kant on Justification in Transcendental Philosophy’. Synthese, 85(1), 2554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian (2005) ‘Kant’s conception of analytic judgement’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(3), 588612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, Sebastian (2007) Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl (2023) Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, Houston (2000) ‘Kant on marks and the immediacy of intuition’. Philosophical Review, 109(2), 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2012) ‘A Kantian reply to Bolzano’s critique of Kant’s analytic-synthetic distinction’. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 85(1), 3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton (2020) ‘Kant on the place of cognition in the progression of our representations’. Synthese, 197(8), 3215–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanzo, Alberto (2014) ‘Kant on existential import’. Kantian Review, 19(2), 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus (2017) ‘Kant’s account of cognition’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(1), 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus, and Watkins, Eric (2020) ‘Kant on cognition and knowledge’. Synthese, 197, 31953213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar