Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2z2hb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T12:22:48.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Active Sympathetic Participation: Reconsidering Kant's Duty of Sympathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Melissa Seymour Fahmy
Melissa Seymour Fahmy
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the Doctrine of Virtue Kant divides duties of love into three categories: beneficent activity (Wohltätigkeit), gratitude (Dankbarkeit) and Teilnehmung – commonly referred to as the duty of sympathy (MS 6: 452). In this paper I will argue that the content and scope of the third duty of love has been underestimated by both critics and defenders of Kant's ethical theory. The account which pervades the secondary literature maintains that the third duty of love includes only two components: an obligation to make use of our natural receptivity to sympathetic feelings as a means to fulfilling other duties of love, and an indirect duty to cultivate these feelings. As a result, Kant's duty of sympathy has been widely regarded as a duty whose value is derived from the way in which it serves other duties, in particular, the duty of beneficent activity, which obliges agents ‘to promote according to one's means the happiness of others in need’ (MS 6: 453). Teilnehmung has thus assumed something of a second-class status among the duties to others. My aim in this paper is to demonstrate that the prevailing account of Kant's third duty of love is incomplete.

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 31 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allison, Henry (1990) Kant's Theory of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, Marcia (1995) Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Cartwright, David (1987) ‘Kant's view of the moral significance of kindhearted emotions and the moral insignificance of Kant's view’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 21: 298–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell's German-English English-German Dictionary (1978) (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Collins German-English English-German Dictionary, 5th edition (2004), ed. Terrell, Peter, Schnorr, Veronika, Smith, Wendy V. A. and Breitsprecher, Roland (London, New York: Collins).Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (2000) ‘Kant's cold sage and the sublimity of apathy’, Kantian Review, 4: 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duden: das grosse Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache in sechs Bänden (CD-ROM) (2000) (Mannheim: Dudenverlag).Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary (1963) Laws of Freedom (New York: Barnes & Noble).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993) Kant and the Experience of Freedom (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1964) The Doctrine of Virtue, trans. Mary, Gregor (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1983) Kant's Ethical Philosophy, trans. Ellington, James W. (Indianapolis, IN: Hacket).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1974) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Mary, Gregor (The Hague: Nijhoff).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel.(1997) Lectures on Ethics, trans. Peter, Heath (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul, Guyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (2002) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Allen, Wood (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Langenscheidt Standard German Dictionary (1993), ed. Heinz, Messinger, Gisela, Tiirck and Helmut, Willmann (Berlin, Munich: Langenscheidt).Google Scholar
The Oxford-Duden German Dictionary, revised edition (1997), ed. Scholze-Stubenrecht, W. and Sykes, J. B. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997) Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohr, Karen (2002) ‘Virtue ethics and Kant's cold-hearted benefactor’, Journal of Value Inquiry, 36: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (1990) Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. (1991) ‘Unsociable sociability: the anthropological basis of Kantian ethics. Philosophical Topics’, 19: 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen. (2008) Kantian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar