Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:44:40.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neo-Kantian Cosmopolitanism and International Law: Modest Practicality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2019

Peter Sutch
Peter Sutch*
Affiliation:
Cardiff University University of the Witwatersrand
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the practical approach to global justice advocated by the cosmopolitan political theorists Pogge, Beitz and Buchanan. Using a comparative exposition it outlines their reliance on international law and on human rights law in particular. The essay explores the neo-Kantian influence on the practical approach and offers an original critique of this trend in contemporary international political theory.

Keywords

international lawhuman rightsneo-Kantian cosmopolitanismpractical approach
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant & Law , December 2019 , pp. 605 - 629
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beitz, Charles (2000) ‘Rawls’s Law of Peoples’. Ethics, 110(4), 669–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2000) ‘Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’. Ethics, 110(4), 697–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2004) Justice, Legitimacy and Self Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2010) Human Rights, Legitimacy and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen (2013) The Heart of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1991) Political Writings. Trans. Nisbet, H. B. and ed. Reiss, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Molloy, Sean (2017) Kant’s International Relations: The Political Theology of Perpetual Peace. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (1989) Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (1994) ‘An Egalitarian Law of Peoples’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(3), 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (2008) ‘Assisting the Global Poor’. In Pogge, Thomas and Horton, Keith (eds), Global Ethics: Seminal Essays (St Paul, MN: Paragon), pp. 531–64.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (2012) ‘Divided Against Itself: Aspiration and Reality of International Law’. In Crawford, James and Koskeniemmi, Martti (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1972) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian (2005) ‘Liberal Hierarchy and the License to Use Force’. Review of International Studies, 31(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias (2012) On Global Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simma, Bruno. (1994) ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’. In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, vol. 250. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar