Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:03:39.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maja Schepelmann, Der senile Kant? Zur Widerlegung einer populären These Paderborn: Mentis, 2018 Pp. 286 ISBN 9783957431288 (pbk) €69.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2019

Stephen Howard
Stephen Howard*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Institute of Philosophy
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant & Law , December 2019 , pp. 678 - 682
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Förster, Eckart (2000) Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus postumum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1993) Opus Postumum. Ed. Förster, Eckart, trans. Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuschling, Burkhard (1971) Metaphysische und Transzendentale Dynamik in Kants Opus postumum. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar