Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:25:37.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberal Democracy Needs Religion: Kant on the Ethical Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2022

Dennis Vanden Auweele
Dennis Vanden Auweele*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Belgium
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Liberal democracy has been experiencing a crisis of representation over the last decade, as a disconnect has emerged from some of the foundational principles of liberalism such as personal freedom and equality. In this article, I argue that in the third part of Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason we can find resources to better understand and counteract this crisis of liberal democracy. Kant gives a powerful argument to include an invisible ethical community under a political community, and this ethical community has to take the form of a church. Kant argues then that any political system, and so also liberal democracy, requires religion to ally citizens in a foundational way with the general principles of that system. This would commit liberal nations to having their foundational principles buoyed by religion. Towards the close of the essay, I attend to how this might impact on liberalism’s commitment to religious and ideological pluralism.

Keywords

Kantethical communityreligionliberalismpolitical motivationchurch
Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 299 - 314
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo (eds) (2010) Kant’s Anatomy of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis W. (1960) A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Etienne (2020) ‘Kant’s Doctrine of the Highest Good: A Theologico-Political Interpretation’. Kantian Review, 25, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, Simon (2012) The Faith of the Faithless: Experiments in Political Theology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
DiCenso, James (2012) Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney (2014) ‘The Highest Good and Kant’s Proof(s) of God’s Existence’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31, 137–58.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1981) The Theory of Communicative Action. Trans. McCarthy, T.. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hummel, Dennis and Maedche, Alexander (2019) ‘How Effective is Nudging? A Quantitative Review on the Effect Sizes and Limits of Empirical Nudging Studies’. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insole, Christopher (2016) ‘Kant on Christianity, Religion and Politics: Three Hopes, Three Limits’. Studies in Christian Ethics, 29, 14–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joiner, James (2017) ‘The Kantian Summum Bonum and the Requirements of Reason’. In Firestone, C., Jacobs, N. and Joiner, J. (eds), Kant and the Question of Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary, J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. and ed. Allen, W. Wood and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1989) Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernest (2014) The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert (2010) ‘Evil Everywhere: The Ordinariness of Kantian Radical Evil’. In Anderson-Gold, Sharon and Muchnik, Pablo (eds), Kant’s Anatomy of Evil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 93–115.Google Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (1990) Fallen Freedom. Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Jennifer (1992) ‘Kant’s Ethical Community’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 26, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Kate (2012) Community and Progress in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Muchnik, Pablo (2009) Kant’s Theory of Evil. An Essay on the Dangers of Self-Love and the Aprioricity of History. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (2009) ‘Kant’s Religious Argument for the Existence of God: The Ultimate Dependence of Human Destiny on Divine Assistance’. Faith and Philosophy, 26, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (2010) ‘Kant’s Ethics of Grace: Perspectival Solutions to the Moral Difficulties with Divine Assistance’. Journal of Religion, 90, 530–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papish, Laura (2018) Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2012) Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant on Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2017) ‘Restoring Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55, 435–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (1980) ‘Kantian Constructivisim in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980’. Journal of Philosophy, 77, 515–77.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (1988) ‘Two Conceptions of the Highest Good’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26, 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Philip. (2005) The Social Authority of Reason: Kant’s Critique, Radical Evil, and the Destiny of Humankind. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, Christoph (1988) Radikal böse: Die Karriere des Bösen von Kant bis Nietzsche. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Silber, John (2012) Kant’s Ethics: The Good, Freedom, and the Will. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein Cass, R. (2014) Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi (2013) Kant on Practical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tampio, Nicholas (2014) ‘Pluralism in the Ethical Communityʼ. In Michalson, Gordon (ed.), Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Robert S. (2010) ‘Kant’s Political Religion: The Transparency of Perpetual Peace and the Highest Good’. Review of Politics, 72, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toplišek, Alan (2019) Liberal Democracy in Crisis. Rethinking Resistance under Neoliberal Governmentality. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auweele, Vanden, Dennis (2014) ‘For the Love of God: Kant on Grace’. International Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auweele, Vanden (2019) Pessimism in Kant’s Ethics and Rational Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
—— (2020) ‘Religious Atheism: Assessing Political Religion through Critchley’s Faith of the Faithless ’. In Vanden Auweele, Dennis and Vassányi, Miklós (eds), Past and Present Political Theology (New York: Routledge), 242–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wike, Richard and Fetterolf, Janell (2018) ‘Liberal Democracy’s Crisis of Confidence’. Journal of Democracy, 29, 136–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, Oscar (1954) De Profundis and Other Writings. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1983) Kant’s Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas and Audi, Robert (1997) Religion in the Public Square. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar