Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:01:45.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Enlightenment and Women’s Peculiar Immaturity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2021

Charlotte Sabourin
Charlotte Sabourin*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In ‘What is Enlightenment?’, Kant claims that no women are currently enlightened. Here I argue that this exclusion is due to certain legal restrictions guiding Kant’s conception of enlightenment. As enlightenment is intended to take place in society, it appears that Kant has a specific legal context in mind that affects its enactment. His twofold conception of citizenship and the dimension of subordination he puts forward by restricting the private use of reason will prove useful in clarifying those legal restrictions. It thus seems unlikely that Kant intended women to take an active part in enlightenment.

Keywords

KantEnlightenmentwomensexual equalitysexual differenceimmaturity
Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 235 - 260
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernasconi, R. (2001) ‘Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race’. In Bernasconi, R. (ed.), Race (Oxford: Blackwell), 11–36. Google Scholar
Deligiorgi, K. (2005) Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. (2013) What is Enlightenment? London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (1990) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2013) Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, I. (1996) Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huseyinzadegan, D. (2018) ‘For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon’. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 4(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1997) Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Gregor, M.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (2006a) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. Louden, R.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2006b) ‘An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment’. In Kleingeld, P. (ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History (New Haven: Yale University Press), 17–23.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2006c) ‘On the Common Saying: This may be True in Theory, But it does Not Hold in Practice’. In Kleingeld, P. (ed.), Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History (New Haven: Yale University Press), 44–66.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Zöller, G. and Louden, R.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (1993) ‘The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant’. Philosophical Forum, 25, 134–50.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2019) ‘On Dealing with Kant’s Sexism and Racism’. SGIR Review, 2(2), 3–22.Google Scholar
Kneller, J. (2006) ‘Kant on Sex and Marriage’. In Guyer, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Early Modern Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 447–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaVaque-Manty, M. (2006) ‘Kant’s Children’. Social Theory and Practice, 32(3), 365–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, R. (2000) Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marwah, I. S. (2013) ‘What Nature Makes of Her: Kant’s Gendered Metaphysics’. Hypatia, 28(3), 551–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkola, M. (2011) ‘Kant on Moral Agency and Women’s Nature.’ Kantian Review, 16(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. (2005) ‘Kant’s Untermenschen’. In Andrew, Valls (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 169–93.Google Scholar
Okin, S. M. (1982) ‘Women and the Making of the Sentimental Family’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11, 65–88.Google Scholar
Piché, C. (2015) ‘Kantian Enlightenment as a Critique of Culture’. Con-Textos Kantianos, 2, 197–216.Google Scholar
Sagarra, E. (2017) A Social History of Germany, 1648–1914. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1996) What Is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (2003) ‘Inventing the Enlightenment: Anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the Oxford English Dictionary’. Journal of the History of Ideas, 64(3), 421–43.Google Scholar
Schott, R. M. (1997) ‘The Gender of Enlightenment’. In Schott, R. M. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press), 319–37.Google Scholar
Shell, S. M. (2016) ‘Kant on Citizenship, Society, and Redistributive Justice’. In Faggion, A. et al. (eds), Kant and Social Policies (London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 11–23.Google Scholar
Sieyès, E.-J. (1789) Préliminaire de la Constitution françoise: Reconnoissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l’homme & du citoyen. Paris: Baudouin.Google Scholar
Varden, H. (2017) ‘Kant and Women’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 98(3), 653–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollstonecraft, M. (1993) Political Writings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar