Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:08:35.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Kant’s Metaphysics Profoundly Unsatisfactory? Critical Discussion of A. W. Moore’s Critique of Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2016

Sorin Baiasu
Sorin Baiasu*
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his recent book, The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics, Adrian W. Moore takes Kant to play a crucial role in the evolution of modern philosophy; yet, for him, Kant’s metaphysics is ultimately and profoundly unsatisfactory. In this article, I examine several of Moore’s objections and provide replies. My claim is that Moore’s reading points to fundamental issues, yet these are not issues of Kant’s transcendental idealism, but of the traditional idealism his view has often been taken to represent.

Keywords

KantmetaphysicsA. W. Mooresynthetic a prioritranscendental idealismself-stultification
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 465 - 481
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baiasu, S. (2011) Kant and Sartre: Re-discovering Critical Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiasu, S. (2013a) ‘Introduction: Kant and the British Idealists’. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 19 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Baiasu, S. (2013b) ‘Edward Caird on Kant’s Idealism: Revolutionary or Traditionalist?’. Collingwood and British Idealism Studies, 19 (1), 19–45.Google Scholar
Bird, G. (2006) The Revolutionary Kant. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. ( forthcoming) ‘Transcendental Idealism at the Limit: On A. W. Moore’s Criticism of Kant’. Philosophical Topics.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. (2012) ‘The Return of the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction’. Paradigmi, 5 (1), 19–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1996) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. W. S. Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998) Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and ed. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. (1999) ‘Misplaced Celebrations? Reply to Mark Sacks’ Critical Notice’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7 (3), 387–392.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. (2012) The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar