Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T07:01:25.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Kant’s Ethics Metaphysically Naturalistic? Comments on Frederick Rauscher’s Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Konstantin Pollok
Konstantin Pollok*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 483 - 494
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. Lanier (2005) ‘Neo-Kantianism and the Roots of Anti-Psychologism’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 13, 287–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2013) ‘Naturalism and Kant’s Resolution of the Third Antinomy’. In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca and Margit Ruffing (eds) Proceedings of the XI International Kant Congress: Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense (Berlin: De Gruyter), vol. 3, pp. 731–742.Google Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin (2017) Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick (2015) Naturalism and Realism in Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar