Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:41:21.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urinary chemosignals in giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca): seasonal and developmental effects on signal discrimination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2004

A. M. White
Affiliation:
Office of Giant Panda Conservation, Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112-0051, U.S.A. San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-7455, U.S.A.
R. R. Swaisgood
Affiliation:
Office of Giant Panda Conservation, Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, P.O. Box 120551, San Diego, CA 92112-0051, U.S.A.
H. Zhang
Affiliation:
China Research and Conservation Center for the Giant Panda, Wolong Nature Reserve, Wenchuan, Sichuan, People's Republic of China 623006
Get access

Abstract

As a solitary species, giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca have a chemical communication system that allows for avoidance with conspecifics throughout most of the year and facilitates breeding during their brief reproductive period. To date, most studies have focused on adults during the breeding season, but much remains to be learned about developmental and seasonal effects on chemical communication. Here, using odour discrimination methodology, we examine these contextual influences on chemosignalling in giant pandas for the first time. During the breeding season both adult and subadult giant pandas overtly discriminated conspecific sex using chemical cues in urine. Male urine was consistently investigated more than female urine by pandas across all age–sex categories. This preference for male urine was observed for both adult and subadult urine donors, indicating that adult levels of reproductive hormones are not necessary for the production of sex-specific urinary odour cues. By contrast, giant pandas did not overtly discriminate sex during the non-breeding season. This finding underscores that negative results for discrimination studies need to be interpreted with caution, as many contextual factors may influence overt expression of this ability. Evidence points to seasonal changes in motivation, rather than in the availability of sex-specific chemical cues in urine, as the causal factor for changing odour discrimination patterns. These and other findings are discussed in the light of the potential role that discrimination of odour plays in the regulation of competitive and reproductive interactions in nature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)