Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:55:07.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sperm competition affects the structure of the mammalian vas deferens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2004

Matthew J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, U.S.A
Jenna Nyholt
Affiliation:
Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, U.S.A
Alan F. Dixson
Affiliation:
Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, U.S.A
Get access

Abstract

Sperm competition is widespread, resulting in sexual selection when the gametes of two or more males compete for access to a given set of ova. This study shows, for the first time, that sexual selection has influenced the evolution of the mammalian vas deferens – that is, the muscular duct which rapidly transports spermatozoa from the cauda epididymis to the ampulla during sexual activity. Morphometric studies of 103 species, representing 70 genera of mammals, show that the vas deferens is on average 33% shorter and its muscular walls are 45% thicker, in those forms where sperm competition pressures are greatest. The outer and inner longitudinal muscle layers of the vas are thickened under these conditions, whereas the central, circular muscle layer is significantly reduced. Thus, mammals that have multiple partner mating systems, and large testes in relation to body weight, have shorter and more muscular vasa deferentia than mammals where single partner mating systems, and smaller relative testes sizes, are the norm. These differences are statistically significant after application of procedures to correct for possible phylogenetic biases in the data set. Sperm competition has played an important role in the evolution of the mammalian vasa deferentia, favouring muscular specializations that enhance sperm transport.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)