Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:25:29.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial organization of the honey badger Mellivora capensis in the southern Kalahari: home-range size and movement patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2004

C. M. Begg
Affiliation:
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria Carnivore Conservation Group, Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg
K. S. Begg
Affiliation:
Carnivore Conservation Group, Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg
J. T. Du Toit
Affiliation:
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria
M. G. L. Mills
Affiliation:
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria Carnivore Conservation Group, Endangered Wildlife Trust, Johannesburg South African National Parks
Get access

Abstract

Radio-tracking locations of 25 individuals (13 females; 12 males) and visual observations of nine habituated individuals were used to investigate the spatial organization and movement patterns of the honey badger Mellivora capensis in the southern Kalahari. The home ranges of adult male honey badgers (541±93 km2) were significantly larger than the home ranges of adult females (126±13 km2). Female home-range size was five times larger than predicted from body mass. The extensive home ranges of females were likely to be a function of relatively low prey availability in the semi-arid Kalahari and the long period of cub dependence (12–16 months). While mean home-range overlap in females was moderate (13%) and home-range centres were regularly spaced, females did not appear to actively defend a territory and no direct interactions between females were observed. Scent marking appears to mediate spatio-temporal separation and females show a loosely territorial spacing pattern. In contrast, males did not support the typical mustelid pattern of intra-sexual territoriality but instead encompassed the overlapping home ranges of up to 13 females. Males and females differed significantly in their rate of travel (3.8±0.3 km/h vs 2.7±0.2 km/h), straight line (6.2±0.5 km vs 2.4±0.2 km) and actual distance (13.8±0.9 km vs 7.7±0.7 km) moved during an active period but do not differ in the percentage of their home-range area traversed in a single day (3%). Young males tended to have smaller home ranges (151±45 km2) than adult males and showed a spacing pattern more similar to adult females than adult males. In common with other solitary mustelids, the spatial organization suggests a polygynous or promiscuous mating system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)