Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:52:24.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex-related growth patterns in a caecilian amphibian (genus Ichthyophis): evidence from laboratory data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2004

Alexander Kupfer
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Zoologie, Schnittspahnstr. 3, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Armin Kramer
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Zoologie, Schnittspahnstr. 3, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Werner Himstedt
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Zoologie, Schnittspahnstr. 3, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Post-metamorphic growth patterns were analysed in the tropical caecilian amphibian Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) experimentally in captivity over 6 years. Two questions were addressed. (1) Does this Ichthyophis display sexual dimorphism for size? (2) Do ichthyophiid caecilians express an indeterminate growth pattern? Total length did not differ between sexes in the first, second or third year after metamorphosis. In the fourth, fifth and sixth years, females were significantly larger than males. The index of sexual size dimorphism increased from zero in the first year after metamorphosis to 0.104 in the sixth year. Relative growth rates of total length were different for each sex. In the first two growth seasons males grew at higher rates, while from the third growth season females grew faster than males. In general, growth rates increased from the first to the second year after metamorphosis and decreased dramatically after both sexes became mature. As all Ichthyophis in this study grew constantly throughout the first 6 years after metamorphosis, indeterminate growth probably occurs in caecilians as reported for frogs and salamanders. Additionally, growth curves for both sexes of Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis were estimated based on the von Bertalanffy model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)