Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:47:20.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in a changeable arable landscape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2001

Françoise H. Tattersall
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, U.K. School of Agriculture, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, GL7 6JS, U.K.
David W. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, U.K.
Barbara J. Hart
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, GL7 6JS, U.K.
Will J. Manley
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Royal Agricultural College, Cirencester, GL7 6JS, U.K.
Ruth E. Feber
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus are potentially useful indicators of change in arable ecosystems. Here we focus on changes resulting from removal of land from arable production under the set-aside scheme. Wood mice were radio-tracked to compare: (a) their use of set-aside, crop and hedgerow before and after harvest; (b) set-aside configured as margins and as a 3 ha block; (c) cut and uncut 20-m wide set-aside margins. Males had larger home ranges, and were more mobile than females. Ranges were larger, and animals more mobile, before harvest than afterwards. There were no differences in range sizes of breeding and non-breeding animals after harvest, suggesting that changes in habitat use were not a function of cessation of breeding. Before harvest, wood mice used habitats within their ranges at random, and their ranges contained a high proportion of cropped area. After harvest they preferred hedgerow and avoided margin set-aside within their ranges, but did not similarly avoid the set-aside block. The proportion of cropped area within their ranges decreased after harvest, and the proportion of margin increased. Our evidence suggests wood mice avoided using the area adjacent to the hedgerow, perhaps to avoid predators. Uncut set-aside patches were favoured and cut patches avoided, possibly in response to differences in food availability and levels of protection from predators. These results confirm that wood mice are useful indicators of change in arable landscapes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)