Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:00:21.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of parental age and experimentally manipulated brood size on the foraging effort and breeding performance of great skuas (Catharacta skua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

N. Ratcliffe
Affiliation:
Applied Ornithology Unit, IBLS, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, U.K. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Beds SG19 2DL, U.K.
R. W. Furness
Affiliation:
Applied Ornithology Unit, IBLS, Glasgow University, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

We examined the effect of a brood-size manipulation on the foraging effort and chick rearing of known-age great skuas Catharacta skua. Young birds were expected to refrain from increasing reproductive effort and opt for a strategy of brood reduction, while old birds were expected to increase effort and rear more young. Increasing brood size led to an increase in foraging effort and brood neglect. Enlarged broods had a lower mean survival rate, but similar growth rates to one- and two-chick broods. Parents increased foraging effort to maintain chick growth rates at the expense of brood defence. This was associated with higher conspecific predation of enlarged broods. Foraging effort and chick feeding rate decreased with adult age. Younger adults increased foraging time in an attempt to satisfy the nutritional demands of the chicks, while older birds maintained a similar effort for all brood sizes. Younger adults achieved a lower fledging success despite their higher provisioning rates. Younger birds synchronized foraging and guarding duties less well, and so left the chicks unattended more often than older birds. As a consequence, their chicks suffered higher levels of conspecific predation. Defence of chicks through pair co-ordination and aggression was thus an important component of successful breeding for great skuas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)