Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
WOODS, MICHAEL
MCDONALD, ROBBIE A.
and
HARRIS, STEPHEN
2003.
Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis catus in Great Britain.
Mammal Review,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
174.
Gillies, Craig
and
Clout, Mick
2003.
The prey of domestic cats (Felis catus) in two suburbs of Auckland City, New Zealand.
Journal of Zoology,
Vol. 259,
Issue. 3,
p.
309.
FLOWERDEW, John R.
2004.
Advances in the conservation of British mammals, 1954–2004: 50 years of progress with The Mammal Society.
Mammal Review,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 3,
p.
169.
BAKER, PHILIP J.
BENTLEY, AMY J.
ANSELL, RACHEL J.
and
HARRIS, STEPHEN
2005.
Impact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area.
Mammal Review,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
302.
Nelson, S.H.
Evans, A.D.
and
Bradbury, R.B.
2005.
The efficacy of collar-mounted devices in reducing the rate of predation of wildlife by domestic cats.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 94,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
273.
Olifiers, N.
Gentile, R.
and
Fiszon, J. T.
2005.
Relation between small-mammal species composition and anthropic variables in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.
Brazilian Journal of Biology,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
495.
LILITH, MAGGIE
CALVER, MICHAEL
STYLES, IRENE
and
GARKAKLIS, MARK
2006.
Protecting wildlife from predation by owned domestic cats: Application of a precautionary approach to the acceptability of proposed cat regulations.
Austral Ecology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
176.
Nelson, Sarah Helen
Evans, Andrew David
and
Bradbury, Richard Brian
2006.
The efficacy of an ultrasonic cat deterrent.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
83.
Beckerman, A. P.
Boots, M.
and
Gaston, K. J.
2007.
Urban bird declines and the fear of cats.
Animal Conservation,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
320.
Calver, Michael
Thomas, Sandra
Bradley, Stuart
and
McCutcheon, Helen
2007.
Reducing the rate of predation on wildlife by pet cats: The efficacy and practicability of collar-mounted pounce protectors.
Biological Conservation,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 3,
p.
341.
BAKER, PHILIP J.
MOLONY, SUSIE E.
STONE, EMMA
CUTHILL, INNES C.
and
HARRIS, STEPHEN
2008.
Cats about town: is predation by free‐ranging pet catsFelis catuslikely to affect urban bird populations?.
Ibis,
Vol. 150,
Issue. s1,
p.
86.
van Heezik, Yolanda
Smyth, Amber
Adams, Amy
and
Gordon, Joanna
2010.
Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations?.
Biological Conservation,
Vol. 143,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Nicoll, Malcolm
and
Norris, Ken
2010.
Detecting an impact of predation on bird populations depends on the methods used to assess the predators.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 3,
p.
300.
Gordon, J. K.
Matthaei, C.
and
van Heezik, Y.
2010.
Belled collars reduce catch of domestic cats in New Zealand by half.
Wildlife Research,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 5,
p.
372.
Metsers, Elizabeth M.
Seddon, Philip J.
and
van Heezik, Yolanda M.
2010.
Cat-exclusion zones in rural and urban-fringe landscapes: how large would they have to be?.
Wildlife Research,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 1,
p.
47.
Tschanz, Britta
Hegglin, Daniel
Gloor, Sandra
and
Bontadina, Fabio
2011.
Hunters and non-hunters: skewed predation rate by domestic cats in a rural village.
European Journal of Wildlife Research,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 3,
p.
597.
Calver, Michael C.
Grayson, Jacky
Lilith, Maggie
and
Dickman, Christopher R.
2011.
Applying the precautionary principle to the issue of impacts by pet cats on urban wildlife.
Biological Conservation,
Vol. 144,
Issue. 6,
p.
1895.
Duffy, David Cameron
and
Capece, Paula
2012.
Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 7. The Domestic Cat (Felis catus).
Pacific Science,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 2,
p.
173.
Thomas, Rebecca L.
Fellowes, Mark D. E.
Baker, Philip J.
and
Hayward, Matt
2012.
Spatio-Temporal Variation in Predation by Urban Domestic Cats (Felis catus) and the Acceptability of Possible Management Actions in the UK.
PLoS ONE,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 11,
p.
e49369.
Wierzbowska, Izabela A.
Olko, Joanna
Hędrzak, Magdalena
and
Crooks, Kevin R.
2012.
Free-ranging domestic cats reduce the effective protected area of a Polish national park.
Mammalian Biology,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 3,
p.
204.