Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:00:03.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2004

Marcel Cardillo
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, U.K. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds
Affiliation:
Lehrstuhl für Tierzucht, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 12, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany
Elizabeth Boakes
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, U.K. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K.
Andy Purvis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Comparative studies require information on phylogenetic relationships, but complete species-level phylogenetic trees of large clades are difficult to produce. One solution is to combine algorithmically many small trees into a single, larger supertree. Here we present a virtually complete, species-level phylogeny of the marsupials (Mammalia: Metatheria), built by combining 158 phylogenetic estimates published since 1980, using matrix representation with parsimony. The supertree is well resolved overall (73.7%), although resolution varies across the tree, indicating variation both in the amount of phylogenetic information available for different taxa, and the degree of conflict among phylogenetic estimates. In particular, the supertree shows poor resolution within the American marsupial taxa, reflecting a relative lack of systematic effort compared to the Australasian taxa. There are also important differences in supertrees based on source phylogenies published before 1995 and those published more recently. The supertree can be viewed as a meta-analysis of marsupial phylogenetic studies, and should be useful as a framework for phylogenetically explicit comparative studies of marsupial evolution and ecology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)