Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:18:01.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of food or cover removal on spacing patterns and habitat use in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2003

Luca Cimino
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, U.K. Section of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100, Italy
Sandro Lovari
Affiliation:
Section of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Siena, Via Mattioli 4, 53100, Italy
Get access

Abstract

The knowledge of the ability of a species to adapt to a human-altered environment is important for developing wildlife management plans and, in turn, for conservation of the species. Radio-tracking was used to examine the effects of partial food or cover removal (owing to agricultural changes) on the spacing patterns and habitat use of adult roe deer Capreolus capreolus in a mixed wood/agricultural Mediterranean area, during spring–summer 1996–97. For both sexes, there were no changes in home-range and core-area sizes, or in inter-fix distances, after food (field ploughing) or cover (crop harvesting) removal. After food removal, both sexes shifted their home ranges and core areas, spending more time in woodland and less time in the ploughed field. This suggests a change in feeding habits. In addition, similar responses by males and females indicate that their energetic requirements are comparable during the territorial/reproductive period. After removal of cover, males neither shifted their home ranges and core areas, nor changed their habitat use, whereas females responded with significant shifts (by c. 90%) of the core area, and a significant decrease in the proportion of daytime spent in the harvested field. Thus, crop harvesting in this period (May/June) has different effects on the two sexes, with adult females being much less tolerant than males. Differential responses to cover removal were related to the different security requirements of the two sexes around the period of parturition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)