Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:41:53.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensory Analysis and Willingness to Pay for Craft Cider*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2015

Peter R. Tozer ,
Suzette P. Galinato ,
Carolyn F. Ross ,
Carol A. Miles  and
Jill J. McCluskey
Peter R. Tozer*
Affiliation:
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6210.
Suzette P. Galinato
Affiliation:
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6210. e-mail: [email protected]
Carolyn F. Ross
Affiliation:
School of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. e-mail: [email protected]
Carol A. Miles
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, WSU Mount Vernon NWREC, Mount Vernon, WA 98273. e-mail: [email protected]
Jill J. McCluskey
Affiliation:
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6210. e-mail: [email protected]
*
e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We conducted a blind tasting sensory evaluation experiment and a chemical analysis of four craft hard apple ciders from the Pacific Northwest of the USA. Using the sensory and demographic data collected during the experiment, we estimated the consumer willingness-to-pay (WTP), using a contingent valuation model. Overall liking, taste, and aroma, from the sensory evaluation, as well as age of the sampler and if the sampler was a cider drinker, contributed positively to the WTP. In contrast, if the subject was a beer drinker this reduced their WTP. From the chemical analysis we found that tannin level had a positive effect on WTP, but an increased level of sweetness, as part of a ratio of specific gravity to acid, decreased consumer WTP. (JEL Classifications: C91, D12, L66, Q13)

Keywords

U.S. cider industrysensory evaluationwillingness to payblind taste testing
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 2015 , pp. 314 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research funded by the USDA-AMS - Federal-State Marketing Improvement Program (FSMIP). Project entitled Assessment of the Cider Market: Pilot Study in Washington State (GRANT 11680819). The authors are also grateful to an anonymous referee and comments provided by the editor, Karl Storchmann.

References

Ashton, R.H. (2014). Wine as an experience good: Price versus enjoyment in blind tastings of expensive and inexpensive wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 9(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ATTTB (Alcohol and Tobacco Trade and Tax Bureau) (various years). Statistical Report - Wine. ATTTB, Washington, D.C. Report Symbol TTB S 5120-12. Various years 2007–2014.Google Scholar
Capehart, K.W. (2015). Fine water: A hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Wine Economics. 10(2), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardebat, J.-M., and Figuet, J.-M. (2004). What explains Bordeaux wine prices? Applied Economics Letters, 11(5), 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didier, A., Symoneaux, R., Schlich, P., Sybiril, S., Droger, D., Baudin, R., Gilles, Y., Sanoner, P., Lequéré, J.M., Simon, J.P., Raimbaud, F.J., Dechatre, J.C., Lepage, A., Simard, V., Desvignes, M., and Legendre, P. (2012). Le cidre, d'une logique de l'offre vers une démarche marketing de la demande. Innovations Agronomiques, 25, 1–14.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R., Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Emerson, J.W., Herschkowitsch, A., and Katz, J. (2008). Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. Journal of Wine Economics, 3(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimsrud, K.M., McCluskey, J.J., Loureiro, M.L., and Wahl, T.I. (2004). Consumer attitudes to genetically modified food in Norway. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, K.G. (2002). Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 13:275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanemann, W.M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B.J. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, C., McCluskey, J.J., and Ross, C. (2011). Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for oak attributes in Washington Chardonnays. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(2), 556–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Riesling Foundation (2008). Riesling Taste Profile. http://drinkriesling.com/wp-content/themes/irf/images/tasting-profile-standards.pdf, accessed April 21, 2015.Google Scholar
Jolicoeur, C. (2013). The New Cider Maker's Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for Craft Producers. Chelsea Green Publishing: White River Junction, VT.Google Scholar
Kanninen, B.J., and Khawaja, M.S. (1995). Measuring goodness of fit for the double-bounded logit model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(4), 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keri, J. (2015). Hard cider is having a moment. FiveThirtyEight. Accessed at http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/hard-cider-is-having-a-moment/ April 1 2015.Google Scholar
Lawless, H.T., and Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecocq, S., and Visser, M.. (2006). What determines wine prices: Objective vs. Sensory characteristics. Journal of Wine Economics, 1(1), 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012). Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata. MPRA, Munich. http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/, accessed February 27, 2015.Google Scholar
Miles, C.A., Zimmerman, A., Scheenstra, F., King, J., and Moulton, G. (2015). Bottled cider evaluation protocol at WSU Mount Vernon NWREC. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Miles, C.A., and King, J. (2014). Yield, labor, and fruit and juice quality characteristics of machine and hand-harvested ‘Brown Snout’ specialty cider apple. HortTechnology, 24, 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northwest Cider Association (NWCA) (2015). Accessed at http://www.nwcider.com/ January 7, 2015.Google Scholar
Oczkowski, E., and Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Wine prices and quality ratings: A meta-regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olkin, I., Lou, Y., Stokes, L., and Cao, J. (2015). Analyses of wine-tasting data: A tutorial. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(1), 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rihar, M., Hrovatin, N., and Zoric, J. (2015). Household valuation of smart-home functionalities in Slovenia. Utilities Policy, 33, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, C., and Zhu, X. (2014). Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy, 69, 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, B. (2013). Cider, Hard and Sweet: History, Traditions and Making Your Own. Countryman Press: Woodstock, VT.Google Scholar
Yang, N., McCluskey, J.J., and Ross, C. (2009). Willingness to pay for sensory properties in Washington State red wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 4(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar