Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:29:04.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pricing Models for German Wine: Hedonic Regression vs. Machine Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

Britta Niklas  and
Wolfram Rinke
Britta Niklas*
Affiliation:
Institute of Development Research and Development Policy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Universitätsstr.105, 44789Bochum, Germany
Wolfram Rinke
Affiliation:
Department of Information-Technology and Information-Management, Fachhochschule Burgenland GmbH, Campus 1, A-7000Eisenstadt, Austria; e-mail: [email protected].
*
e-mail: [email protected], corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines whether there are different hedonic price models for different German wines by grape variety, and identifies influential factors that focus on weather variables and direct and indirect quality measures for wine prices. A log linear regression model is first applied only for Riesling, and then machine learning is used to find hedonic price models for Riesling, Silvaner, Pinot Blanc, and Pinot Noir. Machine learning exhibits slightly greater explanatory power, suggests adding additional variables, and allows for a more detailed interpretation of results. Gault&Millau points are shown to have a significant positive impact on German wine prices. The log linear approach suggests a huge effect of different quality categories on the wine prices for Riesling with the highest price premiums for Auslese and “Beerenauslese/Trockenbeerenauslese/Eiswein (Batbaice),” while the machine learning model shows, that additionally the alcohol level has a positive effect on wines in the quality categories “QbA,” “Kabinett,” and “Spätlese,” and a mostly negative one in the categories “Auslese” and “Batbaice.” Weather variables exert different affects per grape variety, but all grape varieties have problems coping with rising maximum temperatures in the winter and with rising minimum and maximum temperatures in the harvest season. (JEL Classifications: C45, L11, Q11)

Keywords

German wine priceshedonic pricingmachine learningweather changes
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , August 2020 , pp. 284 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are indebted to an anonymous referee and the participants at the 11th Annual AAWE Conference in Padua for many helpful comments.

References

Ashenfelter, O. (2010). Predicting the quality and prices of Bordeaux wines. Journal of Wine Economics, 5(1), 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., and Storchmann, K. (2010). Measuring the economic effect of global warming on viticulture using auction, retail and wholesale prices. Review of Industrial Organization, 37(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., and Storchmann, K. (2016). Climate change and wine: A review of the economic implications. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(1), 105–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byron, R. P., and Ashenfelter, O. (1995). Predicting the quality of an unborn Grange. Economic Record, 71(212), 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsar, J., Curk, T., Erjavec, A., Gorup, C., Hocevar, T., Milutinovic, M., Mozina, M., Polajnar, M., Toplak, M., Staric, A., Stajdohar, M., Umek, L., Zagar, L., Zbontar, J., Zitnik, M., and Zupan, B. (2013). Orange: Data mining toolbox in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14(Aug.), 2349–2353.Google Scholar
Diel, A., and Payne, J. (eds.). (2002–2009). Gault&Millau Weinguide Deutschland. München: Christian Verlag.Google Scholar
Dumancas, G., and A Bello, G. (2015). Comparison of machine-learning techniques for handling multicollinearity in big data analytics and high performance data mining. Supercomputing 2015: The International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis (Austin, TX). doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1579.4641.Google Scholar
Fecke, B. (2014). Klimawandel stellt Winzer vor neue Probleme. Deutschlandfunk, 03.11.2014. Available from: http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/weinanbau-klimawandel-stelltwinzer-vor-neue-probleme.697.de.html?dram:article_id=302145 (accessed on November 8, 2017).Google Scholar
Garg, A., and Tai, K. (2013). Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods in modelling of data with multicollinearity. Inter. J. Modelling, Identification and Control, 18(4), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, G. D. (1991). Interpreting neural network connection weights. Artificial Intelligence Expert, 6(4), 46–51.Google Scholar
Giam, X., and Olden, J. D. (2015). A new R2-based metric to shed greater insight on variable importance in artificial neural networks. Elsevier Ecological Modelling 313, 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, A. T. C. (1995). Back-propagation neural networks for modelling complex systems. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 9(3),143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Haeger, J. W., and Storchmann, K. (2006). Prices of American pinot noir wines: Climate, craftsmanship, critics. Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashem, S. (1992). Sensitivity analysis for feedforward artificial neural networks with differentiable activation functions. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (Baltimore, MD), 419–424. New York: IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Hornik, K., Stichcombe, M., and White, H. (1990). Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks, 3, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. V., and Storchmann, K. (2001). Wine market prices and investment under uncertainty. An econometric model for Bordeaux Crus Classés. Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
Kriener, M., and Mortsiefer, H. (2017). Weinproduktion sinkt auf 50-Jahres-Tief. Der Tagesspiegel, 2017-10-24. Available from https://www.tagesspiegel.de/wirtschaft/ernte-2017-weinproduktion-sinkt-auf-50-jahres-tief/20497304.html.Google Scholar
Lecocq, S., and Visser, M. (2006). Spatial variations in weather conditions and wines prices in Bordeaux. Journal of Wine Economics, 1(2), 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Technology (2016). Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence. Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf.Google Scholar
Niklas, B. (2017). Impact of annual weather fluctuations on wine production in Germany. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, E. (2001). Hedonic wine price functions and measurement error. Economic Record, 77(239), 374–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, E. (2014). Wine prices and quality ratings: A meta regression analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 97(1), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oczkowski, E. (2016). The effect of weather on wine quality and prices: An Australian spatial analysis. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olden, J. D., and Jackson, D. A. (2002). Illuminating the “black-box”: A randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecological Modelling, 154, 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olden, J. D., Joy, M. K., and Death, R. G. (2004). An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data. Ecological Modelling, 178, 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. W. (2012). Applying point elasticity of demand principles to optimal pricing in management accounting. International Journal of Applied Economics and Finance, 6, 89–99.Google Scholar
Payne, J. (eds.). (2010–2015). Gault&Millau Weinguide Deutschland. München: Christian Verlag.Google Scholar
Ramirez, C. D. (2008). Wine quality, wine prices and the weather: Is Napa “different”? Journal of Wine Economics, 3(2), 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinke, W. (2015). Calculating the dependency of components of observable nonlinear systems using artificial neural networks. MakeLearn & TIIM Conference Proceedings, 367–374. Available from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tkp:mklp15:367-374.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review, 65(6), 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, W. (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., and Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, G. (2000). Individual and collective reputation indicators of wine quality. Centre for International Economic Studies, Discussion Paper No. 0009, March. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228286730_Individual_and_Collective_Repuatation_Indicators_of_Wine_Quality.Google Scholar
Schamel, G. (2002). California wine winners: A hedonic analysis of regional and winery reputation indicators. Paper presented at the AAEA Meeting, July 28–31, Long Beach, CA.Google Scholar
Schamel, G. (2003). A hedonic pricing model for German wine. Agrarwirtschaft, 52(5), 247–254.Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 659–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavlik, J. W., and Diettrich, T. G. (eds.). (1990). Reading in Machine Learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., Kraus, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W., Saxenian, A., Shah, J., Tambe, M., and Teller, A. (2016). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. One hundred year study on artificial intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, 8. Available from https://ai100.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/ai100report10032016fnl_singles.pdf.Google Scholar
Storchmann, K. (2005). English weather and Rhine wine quality: An ordered probit approach. Journal of Wine Research, 16(2), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchmann, K. (2012). Wine economics. Journal of Wine Economics, 7(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrane, C. (2004). In defence of the price hedonic model in wine research. Journal of Wine Research, 15(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (1996). A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Review of Economic Studies, 63, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witten, I., Eibe, F., and Hall, M. (2017). Data Mining – Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th edition, 261–269. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Yeh, I.-C., and Cheng, W.-L. (2010). First and second order sensitivity analysis of MLP. Neurocomputing, 73, 2225–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, M., Fletcher, T., and Shawe-Taylor, J. (2015). Machine learning in fine wine price prediction. Journal of Wine Economics, 10(2), 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Niklas and Rinke supplementary material

Niklas and Rinke supplementary material 1

Download Niklas and Rinke supplementary material(File)
File 145.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Niklas and Rinke supplementary material

Niklas and Rinke supplementary material 2

Download Niklas and Rinke supplementary material(File)
File 162 Bytes