Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:23:13.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is There Consensus Among Wine Quality Ratings of Prominent Critics? An Empirical Analysis of Red Bordeaux, 2004–2010*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2013

Robert H. Ashton
Robert H. Ashton*
Affiliation:
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, 100 Fuqua Drive, Durham, NC 27708; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the level of consensus, or agreement, among the wine quality ratings of six prominent wine critics for seven consecutive vintages of red Bordeaux. Consensus, a critical component of expertise in wine evaluation, has important implications for consumers' reliance on critics' ratings in deciding which wines to purchase or consume. The principal analyses focus on a core set of wines in each year that were rated by all six critics. Additional analyses concern differences in agreement for classified growths vs. nonclassified growths and for critics of different nationalities (American, British, and French). The level of consensus among these prominent critics is contrasted with that among both wine professionals who are not prominent critics and professionals from several other fields. (JEL Classification: C93)

Keywords

Bordeaux quality ratingswine critic agreementwine critic consensuswine quality evaluation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , November 2013 , pp. 225 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am indebted to David Bolomey, whose website bordoverview.com provides the critics' ratings on which this paper is based, for conversations that have clarified both the website's contents and the process of en primeur tastings; to Alison Ashton for helpful comments on an earlier version; and to Zhenhua Chen for excellent research assistance. I am also indebted to the reviewer for useful comments.

References

Anson, J. (2012). Pavie and Angelus promoted in new St. Emilion classification. www.Decanter.com.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., and Quandt, R. (1999). Analyzing a wine tasting statistically. Chance, 12, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, R.H. (2012). Reliability and consensus of experienced wine judges: Expertise within and between? Journal of Wine Economics, 7, 70–87.Google Scholar
Asimov, E. (2012, May 24). Chateau Pavie, a St. Emilion wine, gets a good and a bad review. New York Times, www.nytimes.com.Google Scholar
Burnham, D., and Skilleas, O.M. (2008). You'll never drink alone: Wine tasting and aesthetic practice. In F., Alhoff (ed.), Wine & Philosophy: A Symposium on Thinking and Drinking. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 157–171.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. (2004a). Who won the 1976 blind tasting of French Bordeaux and U.S. cabernets? Parametrics to the rescue. Journal of Wine Research, 15, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. (2004b). On designing experiments and analysing data to assess the reliability and accuracy of blind wine tastings. Journal of Wine Research, 15, 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cliff, M.A., and King, M.C. (1997). The evaluation of judges at wine competitions: The application of eggshell plots. Journal of Wine Research, 8, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiring, A. (2008). The Battle for Wine and Love, or How I Saved the World from Parkerization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Hadj Ali, H., and Nauges, C. (2007). The pricing of experience goods: The example of en primeur wine. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 91–103.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. (2008). An examination of judge reliability at a major U.S. wine competition. Journal of Wine Economics, 3, 105–113.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. (2009a). An analysis of the concordance among 13 U.S. wine competitions. Journal of Wine Economics, 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R.T. (2009b). How expert are “expert” wine judges? Journal of Wine Economics, 4, 233–241.Google Scholar
McCoy, E. (2005). The Emperor of Wine. The Rise of Robert M. Parker, Jr. and the Reign of American Taste. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Quandt, R.E. (2007). On wine bullshit: Some new software? Journal of Wine Economics, 2, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. (2004). Ch. Pavie 2003—Peace breaks out. www.JancisRobinson.com.Google Scholar
Taber, G.M. (2011). A Toast to Bargain Wines: How Innovators, Iconoclasts, and Winemaking Revolutionaries Are Changing the Way the World Drinks. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Voss, R. (2004). Robinson, Parker have a row over Bordeaux. San Francisco Chronicle, F2.Google Scholar