Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:55:24.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intangibles, Export Intensity, and Company Performance in the French Wine Industry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Paul Amadieu ,
Carole Maurel  and
Jean-Laurent Viviani
Paul Amadieu
Affiliation:
University of Montpellier, UFR AES, Av. Raymond Dugrand, CS 59640, 34960 Montpellier Cedex 2, France; e-mail: [email protected].
Carole Maurel
Affiliation:
University of Montpellier, ISEM, Rue Vendémiaire, CS 19519, 34960 Montpellier Cedex 2, France; e-mail: [email protected].
Jean-Laurent Viviani
Affiliation:
University of Rennes, IGR-IAE, 11 Rue Jean Macé, 35708 Rennes, France ; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intangible assets can play a strategic role in the implementation of differentiated strategies in foreign markets. The literature has addressed the impact of intangible assets on both exports and financial performance and the effects of exports on company financial performance (profit and risk). This article aims to analyze the effect of exports on the relationship between intangibles and company performance in the wine industry. Empirical studies show that intangibles have a positive but diminishing impact on exports. The effect of exports on financial performance differs depending on whether we consider corporations or cooperatives. While intangible expenses reduce company risk in both samples whatever the level of export intensity, the effects are different with profit. In corporations, intangible expenses have a positive impact on profit only when there is a high level of expenses and a high level of export intensity. (JEL Classifications: G32, L25, Q12, Q13)

Keywords

Export intensityintangible investmentprofitriskwine
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , November 2013 , pp. 198 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors gratefully acknowledge Jean-Pierre Couderc, Karl Storchmann, and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions that helped improve the manuscript.

References

Aaker, D. (1996). Building Strong Brands. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Alene, A.D. (2010). Productivity growth and the effects of R&D in African agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 41, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A.B., and Jensen, J.B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47, 1–25.Google Scholar
Bobillo, A., Rodriguez-Sanz, J., and Tejerina-Gaite, F. (2006). Innovation investment, competitiveness, and performance in industrial firms. Thunderbird International Business Review, 48, 867–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, E., Caboulet, D., and Guisset, M. (2007). Le coût des fournitures en viticulture et œnologie 2007. Perpignan: ITV France, Chambre d'Agriculture du Roussillon.Google Scholar
Braunerhjelm, P. (1996). The relation between firm-specific intangibles and exports. Economics Letters, 53, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmeli, A. (2001). High- and low-performance firms: Do they have different profiles of perceived core intangible resources and business environment? Technovation, 21, 661–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castaldi, R.M., Sengupta, S., and Silverman, M. (2003). Improving export performance: The case of the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Global Marketing, 17, 45–65.Google Scholar
Caves, R.E. (1982). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavusgil, S.T. (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12, 195–208.Google Scholar
Cavusgil, S.T., and Naor, J. (1987). Firm and management characteristics as discriminators of export marketing activity. Journal of Business Research, 15, 221–235.Google Scholar
Delios, A., and Beamish, P.W. (1999). Geographic scope, product diversification, and the corporate performance of Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 711–727.Google Scholar
Deshpande, R., and Webster, F.W. (1989). Organizational culture and marketing: Defining a research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 53, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanaraj, C., and Beamish, P.W. (2003). A resourced-based approach to the study of export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 242–261.Google Scholar
Edmunds, S., and Khoury, S.J. (1986). Exports: A necessary ingredient in the growth of small business firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 24, 54–65.Google Scholar
Hahn, C.H. (2005). Exporting and performance of plants: Evidence on Korea, international trade in East Asia. NBER–East Asia Seminar on Economics, 14, 53–80.Google Scholar
Hand, J.R.M., and Lev, B. (2004). Intangible Assets: Values, Measures, Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henning, S.L., Lewis, B.L., and Shaw, W.H. (2000). Valuation of components of purchased goodwill using market measures. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 375–386.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S., and Lev, B. (1971). Sales stabilization through export diversification. Review of Economics and Statistics, 53, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, L.C., Webster, E., and Wyatt, A. (2005). Techniques for measuring intangible capital: A review of current practice. Australian Accounting Review, 36–15, 4–21.Google Scholar
INSEE. (2007). Les salaires dans les entreprises en 2005: Une légère reprise. Bulletin INSEE No. 1147.Google Scholar
Katsikeas, C.S. (1994). Export competitive advantages: the relevance of firm characteristics. International Marketing Review, 11, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, E., Rosenberg, J., and Zilberfarb, B.Z. (1985). The demand for liquid assets and involvement in exports; some empirical results. Empirical Economics, 10, 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W.C., Hwang, P., and Burgers, W.P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 45–57.Google Scholar
Kim, W.C., Hwang, P., and Burgers, W.P. (1993). Multinationals’ diversification and the risk return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, A.K., and Jaworski, B.J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.Google Scholar
Kotha, S., Rindova, V.P., and Rothaermel, F. (2001). Assets and action: Firm-specific factors in the internationalization of U.S. Internet firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 769–791.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L., and Bourgault, M. (1998). R&D–related capabilities as determinants of export performance. Small Business Economics, 10, 365–377.Google Scholar
Leonidou, L.C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 279–302.Google Scholar
Lev, B. (2004). Sharpening the intangibles edge. Harvard Business Review, 82, 109–116.Google Scholar
Lev, B., and Zarowin, P. (1998). The market valuation of R and D expenditures. Working paper, New York University.Google Scholar
López Rodríguez, J., and García Rodríguez, R.M. (2005). Technology and export behaviour: A resource-based view approach. International Business Review, 14, 539–557.Google Scholar
Lu, J.W., and Beamish, P.W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 598–609.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. Cowles Foundation monograph no. 16 (Wiley, New York), reprinted in a second edition with Markowitz's comments (1991, Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
Marr, B.D., Gray, D., and Neely, A. (2003). Why do firms measure their intellectual capital? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4, 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, P., and Oviatt, B. (1996). New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 23–40.Google Scholar
Miller, J.C., and Pras, B. (1980). The effects of multinational and export diversification on the profit stability of U.S. corporations. Southern Economic Journal, 46, 792–805.Google Scholar
Morgan, N.A., Vorhies, D.W., and Schlegelmilch, B.B. (2006). Resource–performance relationships in industrial export ventures: The role of resource inimitability and substitutability. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 621–633.Google Scholar
Narver, J.C., and Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 4, 20–35.Google Scholar
Ogbuehi, A.O., and Longfellow, T.A. (1994). Perceptions of U.S. manufacturing SMEs concerning exporting: A comparison based on export experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 32, 4, 37–48.Google Scholar
Park, A., Yang, D., Shi, X., and Jiang, Y. (2010). Exporting and firm performance: Chinese exporters and the Asian financial crisis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 822–842.Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remaud, H. (2006). L'influence de l'orientation marché sur la compétitivité export des petites Entreprises. 8th Congrès International Francophone en Entrepreneuriat et PME, October 25–27, Fribourg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Rialp, A., and Rialp, J. (2006). Faster and more successful exporters: An exploratory study of born global firms from the resource-based view. Journal of Euromarketing, 16, 71–86.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.D., and Rindal, K. (1995). Why exports really matter! Institute for International Economics and the Manufacturing Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rodov, I., and Leliaert, P. (2002). FiMIAM: Financial method of intangible assets measurement. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3, 323–336.Google Scholar
Rugman, A.M. (1976). Risk reduction by international diversification. International Journal of Business Studies, 7, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenthal, T., and Bausch, A. (2009). Research on export performance over the past 10 years: A narrative review. European Journal of International Management, 3, 328–364.Google Scholar
Salomon, R., and Shaver, J.M. (2005). Export and domestic sales: Their interrelationship and determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 855–871.Google Scholar
Shaver, J.M. (2006). The benefits of geographic sales diversification: How exporting facilitates capital investment. Working paper, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Shrader, R.C., Oviatt, B.M., and McDougall, P.P. (2000). How new ventures exploit trade offs among international risk factors: Lessons for the accelerated internationalization of the century. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1227–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvente, F.R. (2005). Changing export status and firm performance: Evidence from UK small firms. Applied Economic Letters, 12, 567–571.Google Scholar
Sousa, C.M.P., Martínez-López, F., and Coelho, F. (2008). The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005. International Journal of Management Review, 10, 343–374.Google Scholar
Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non–R&D–intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy, 28, 819–832.Google Scholar
St-Pierre, J. (2003). Relations entre l'exportation, le développement organisationnel et la situation financière des PME canadiennes. Revue Internationale PME, 16, 2, 61–82.Google Scholar
Tannous, G.F., and Sarkar, A.K. (1993). Banks and small business export finance: New targets for services and marketing strategies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 11, 2, 10–17.Google Scholar
Thirtle, C., Piesse, J., and Schimmelpfenning, D. (2008). Modeling the length and shape of the R&D lag: An application to UK agricultural productivity. Agricultural Economics, 39, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Biesebroeck, J. (2003). Revisiting some productivity debates. NBER Working Paper 10065. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viviani, J.L. (2009). Export implicit financial performance: The case of French wine companies. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 12, 23–48.Google Scholar
Weasthead, P., Wright, M., and Ucbasabaran, D. (2001). The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venture, 16, 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, C., Ibeh, K., and Dimitratos, P. (2008). UK export performance research: Review and implications. International Small Business Journal, 26, 207–239.Google Scholar
Wood, E., and Kaplan, D. (2005). Innovation and performance improvement in the South African wine industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, A. (2008). What financial and non-financial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 38, 217–256.Google Scholar