Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:43:54.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consumer Sensory Evaluations of Wine Quality: The Respective Influence of Price and Country of Origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Roberta Veale  and
Pascale Quester
Roberta Veale
Affiliation:
Business School, The University of Adelaide, 233 North Tce, Adelaide, South Australia 5000. Phone: (61) 88303 5687. E-mail:[email protected]
Pascale Quester
Affiliation:
Business School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005. Phone: (61) 88303 4843. E-mail:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the respective influences of price and country of origin as extrinsic cues on consumer evaluations of wine quality when all intrinsic cues are experienced through sensory perception. Taste testing experiments were conducted (N = 263) using Chardonnay as the test product in a 3 (country of origin, COO) × 3 (price) × 3 (acid level) conjoint analysis fractional factorial design. Price and COO were both found to be more important contributors to perception of wine quality than taste. Reliance on extrinsic cues was found to remain extremely robust even when all intrinsic cues were available through sensory experience for respondent evaluation. The research demonstrated that even when evaluating a product through consumption, consumer belief in the price/value schema dominates quality assessment. These findings mean that marketers cannot assume that intrinsic product attributes, even when experienced, will be weighted and interpreted accurately by consumers. The research significantly advances our understanding of consumers' use of extrinsic cues (price and COO specifically), and their respective influence in their determination of both expected and experienced quality. (JEL Classification: Q11, D12, M31)

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 2008 , pp. 10 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, J. I., Mela, D. J. and Evans, R. E. (1994). The Influences of Attitudes, Beliefs and Label Information on Perceptions of Reduced-fat Spread. Appetite, 22(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acebron, L. B. and Dopico, D. C. (2000). The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: and empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preference, 11, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, J. and Kamakura, W. A. (1999). Country of origin: a competitive advantage? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, J. and Hutchinson, J. W. (2000). Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 123–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Sulaiti, K. I. and Baker, M. J. (1998). Country of origin effects: a literature review. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 16(3), 150–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badri, M. A., Davis, D. L. and Davis, D. F. (1995). Decision support for global marketing strategies: the effect of country of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 4(5), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldy, M. W. (1993). The University Wine Course, A wine Appreciation Text & Self Tutorial. San Francisco. The Wine Appreciation Guild.Google Scholar
Becker, T. (2000). Consumer perception of fresh meat quality: a framework for analysis. British Food Journal, 102(3), 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilkey, W. J. and Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin Effects on Product Evaluations. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(Spring/Summer), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredahl, L. (2003). Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, P. (1992). Partitioning country of origin effects: Consumer evaluations of a hybrid product. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, P. (2001). The Moderating Effects of Country of Assembly, Country of Parts, and Country of Design on Hybrid Product Evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, J. (1996). Understanding Conjoint Analysis in 15 Minutes. Research Paper Series. Sequim, Washington: Sawtooth Software Inc.Google Scholar
Dean, D. H. (2004). Evaluating potential brand associations through conjoint analysis and market simulation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(7), 506–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, W. (1991). In Search of Value: How price and store name information influence buyers' product perceptions. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8(2), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K. and Hadjikhani, A. (2000). Perceptual product connection in an international context. International Business Review, 9, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eroglu, S. A. and Machleit, K. A. (1988). Effects of individual and product-specific variables on utilizing country of origin as a product quality cue. International Marketing Review, 6(6), 27–41.Google Scholar
Garber, L.L., Hyatt, E.M. and Starr, R.G. (2000). The effects of food color on perceived flavor. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8(4), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatchalian, M.M. (1999). Quality assessment through statistically based sensory evaluation methods. The TQM Magazine, 11(6), 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glitsch, K. (2000). Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: cross-national comparison. British Food Journal, 102(3), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, R. L. (2001). A consumer approach to branded wines. European Journal of Marketing, 20(6), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, K.G. (1997). What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference, 8(3), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Inc.Google Scholar
Han, C.M. (1989). Country image: halo or summary construct? Journal of Marketing Research, 26(May), 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, C.M. (1990). Testing the role of country image in consumer choice behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 6, 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastak, M. and Hong, S. (1991). Country of origin effects on product quality judgments: An information integration perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 8(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. and Reibstein, D. (1985). Holistic conjoint. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 282–285.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R. (2000). Country of origin – a consumer perception perspective of fresh meat. British Food Journal, 102(3), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. (1997). What we have learned from 20 years of conjoint research: when to use self-explicated, graded pairs, full profiles or choice experiments. Research Paper Series. Sequim, Washington: Sawthooth Software Inc.Google Scholar
Hui, M. K. and Zhou, L. (2003). Country-of-manufacture effects for known brands. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2), 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurling, R. and Shepherd, R. (2003). Eating with your eyes: effect of appearance on expectations of liking. Appetite, 41, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imram, N. (1999). The role of visual cues in consumer perception and acceptance of a food product. Nutrition & Food Science, 5(September/October), 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insch, G. S. and McBride, J. B. (2004). The impact of country-of-origin cues on consumer perceptions of product quality: A binational test of the decomposed country-of-origin construct. Journal of Business Research, 57, 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, S. R., Hedderley, D. and MacFie, H. J. H. (2000). Methodological issues in conjoint analysis: a case study. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1217–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jo, M.-S., Nakamoto, K. and Nelson, J.E. (2003). The shielding effects of brand image against lower quality countries-of-origin in global manufacturing. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Kellaris, J. J. and Posavac, S. S. (2004). The Role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(September), 368–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaynak, E., Kucukemiroglu, O. and Hyder, A. S. (1999). Consumers' county-of-origin (COO) perceptions of imported products in a homogeneous less-developed country. European Journal of Marketing, 34(9/10), 1221–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keown, C. and Casey, M. (1995). Purchasing behaviour in the Northern Ireland wine market. British Food Journal, 97(1), 17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. and Koch, E. C. (2003). Preconceptions of taste based on color. Journal of Psychology, 137(3), 233–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotler, P. and Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product and beyond: a place marketing and brand management. Brand Management, 9(4), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupiec, B. and Reveil, B. (2001). Measuring consumer quality judgments. British Food Journal, 103(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusela, H., Spence, M. T. and Kanto, A. J. (1998). Expertise effects on prechoice decision processes and final outcomes: a protocol analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5/6), 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. and Lou, C.-C. (1996). Consumer reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic cues in product evaluations: a conjoint approach. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liefeld, J. P., Heslop, L. A., Papadopoulos, N. and Wall, M. (1996). Dutch consumer use of intrinsic, country-of-origin and price cues in product evaluation and choice. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, L.-W. and Sternquist, B. (1994). Taiwanese consumers' perceptions of product information cues: country of origin and store prestige. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J. (1988). Analyzing decision making: metric conjoint analysis. Sage University Paper, Series: Quantitative Applications in Social Sciences, No. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maheswaran, D. (1994). Country of origin as a stereotype: effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21, 354–365.Google Scholar
McCollough, J. and Best, R. (1979). Conjoint measurement: temporal stability and structural reliability. Journal of Marketing Research, February, 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohamad, O., Ahmed, Z. U. Jr., E. D. H., and Tyebkhan, T. H. (2000). Does ‘made in…’ matter to consumers? A Malaysian study of country of origin effect. Multinational Business Review, Fall, 69–73.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. B. (1976). The influence of price differences and brand familiarity on brand perferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 42–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagashima, A. (1970). A comparison of Japanese and U.S. attitudes toward foreign products. Journal of Marketing, 34, 68–74.Google Scholar
Nebanzahl, I. and Jaffe, E. D. (1996). Measuring the joint effect of brand and country image in consumer evaluation of global products. International Marketing Review, 13(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northen, J. R. (2000). Quality attributes and quality cues, Effective communication in the UK meat supply chain. British Food Journal, 102(3), 230–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okechuku, C. (1994). The importance of product country of origin: a conjoint analysis of the United States, Canada, Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Marketing, 28(4), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, J.C. (1972). Cue utilization of the quality perception process: A cognitive model and an empirical test. Purdue University.Google Scholar
Oude Ophuis, P.A.M. and Van Trijp, H. C. M. (1995). Perceived quality: a market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference, 6, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, N. and Heslop, L. A. (1989). National stereotypes and product evaluations in a socialist country. International Marketing Review, 7(1), 32–47.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, N. and Heslop, L. A. (1993). Product Country Images - Impact and Role in International Marketing. New York: International Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, N. and Heslop, L. A. (2002). Country equity and country branding: problems and prospects. Brand Management, 9(April), 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechmann, C. and Ratneshwar, S. (1992). Consumer covariation judgments: theory or data driven. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(December), 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phau, I. and Prendergast, G. P. (2000). Conceptualizing the country of origin of brand. Journal of Marketing Communications, 6, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piron, F. (2000). Consumers' perceptions of the country-of-origin effect on purchasing intention of inconspicuous products. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 308–321.Google Scholar
Quester, P. G. and Smart, J. (1998). The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers' use of product attribute. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(3), 220–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A. R. and Monroe, K. B. (1988). “The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A. R. and Olson, E. M. (1990). Information examination as a function of information type and dimension of consumer expertise: some exploratory findings. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 361–366.Google Scholar
Rao, V. R. and Hauser, J. R. (2004). Conjoint analysis, related modeling, and application. Market Research and Modeling: Progress and Prospects, A Tribute to Paul Green. Wind, Y. and Green, P. E., Boston: Kluwer, 141–168.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S. and Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, B. W. (1969). Sensitivity, reliability, and consumer taste testing: some ‘rights’ and ‘wrongs’. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(February), 102–106.Google Scholar
ScanTrack-Liquor (2005). AC Nielsen Bottled Table Wine Market Update. ScanTrack Liquor AC Nielsen, AC Nielsen.Google Scholar
Siu, N. Y.-M. and Wong, H.-Y. (2002). The impact of product-related factors on perceived product safety. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 20(3), 185–194.Google Scholar
Snoj, B., Korda, A. P. and Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(3), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS-Inc (1997). SPSS Conjoint 8.0. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Srikatanyoo, N. and Gnoth, J. (2002). Nation branding - country image and international tertiary education. Brand Management, 10(2), 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, N., Jain, S. C. and Sikand, K. (2004). An experimental study of two dimensions of country-of-origin (manufacturing country and branding country) using intrinsic and extrinsic cues. International Business Review, 13, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, G. L. and Burger, K. (1987). An Investigation of the Determinants of Cue Utilization. Psychology & Marketing, 4(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, A. C. B. (1999). Factors affecting consumer perceptions on product safety. European Journal of Marketing, 33(9), 911–925.Google Scholar
Van Trijp, H. C. M. and Schifferstein, H. N. J. (1995). Sensory analysis in marketing practice: comparison and integration. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10(1995), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdú Jover, A., Lloréns Montes, F.J. and Fuentes Fuentes, M.M. (2004). Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: the case of red wine. Food Quality and Preference, 15, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vranesevic, T. and Stancec, R. (2003). The effect of the brand on perceived quality of food products. British Food Journal, 105(11), 811–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wansink, B., Park, S. B., Sonka, S. and Morganosky, M. (2000). How soy labeling influences preferences and taste. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, D. A. and Durlach, P. (2003). Effect of color on expected and experienced refreshment, intensity and liking of beverages. American Journal of Psychology, 116(4), 633–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed