Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:59:33.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing Varietal Distinctiveness of the World's Wine Regions: Evidence from a New Global Database*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

Kym Anderson
Kym Anderson*
Affiliation:
Wine Economics Research Centre, School of Economics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, and Crawford School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consumers are always looking for new types of wines. Producers compete for their attention by trying to product differentiate at the same time as they are responding to technological improvements, climate change, and evolving demand patterns. In doing so, wineries are increasingly highlighting their regional and varietal distinctiveness. This paper examines the extent to which the choice of winegrape varieties in wine regions has already changed over the first decade of the twenty-first century in both the Old World and New World. In doing so, it reports a varietal intensity index of different regions and an index of similarity of varietal mix between regions. The study is based on a new database of vine-bearing areas circa 2000 and 2010 for nearly 1,300 DNA-distinct winegrape varieties, spanning over 600 regions in 44 countries that together account for 99 percent of the world's wine production. (JEL Classifications: D24, L66, Q13, Q15)

Keywords

terroirvarietal intensity indexvarietal similarity index
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 249 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Revision of a paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association of Wine Economists, Stellenbosch, South Africa, June 26–29, 2013. The author is grateful for meticulous research assistance by Nanda Aryal in compiling the database and indicators, for helpful comments from two anonymous referees, and for financial assistance from Australia's Grape and Wine Research and Development Corporation (Project Number UA 12/08). Views expressed are the author's alone.

References

Alston, J.M., Andersen, M.A., James, J.S., and Pardey, P.G. (2010). Persistence Pays: U.S. Agricultural Productivity Growth and the Benefits from Public R&D Spending. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P. (1998). Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. London: CAB International.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. (2010). Varietal intensities and similarities of the world's wine regions. Journal of Wine Economics 5(2), 270–309.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. (2013). Which Winegrape Varieties Are Grown Where? A Global Empirical Picture. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. Available at www.adelaide.edu.au/press/winegrapes/.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., and Aryal, N.R. (2013). Database of Regional, National and Global Winegrape Bearing Areas by Variety, 2000 and 2010. Available at www.adelaide.edu.au/wine-econ/databases/.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., and Nelgen, S. (2011). Global Wine Markets, 1961 to 2009: A Statistical Compendium. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press. Available at www.adelaide.edu.au/press/titles/global-wine/.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., and Wittwer, G. (2013). Modeling global wine markets to 2018: Exchange rates, taste changes, and China's import growth. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(2), 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat. (2013). Basic vineyard survey. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database/.Google Scholar
Fegan, P.W. (2003). The Vineyard Handbook: Appellations, Maps and Statistics, rev. ed. Springfield, IL: Phillips Brothers for the Chicago Wine School.Google Scholar
Gergaud, O., and Ginsburgh, V. (2008). Endowments, production technologies and the quality of wines in Bordeaux: Does terroir matter? Economic Journal, 118, F142–57. [Reprinted in Journal of Wine Economics, 5 (2010), 3–21.]Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79(5), 957–970.Google Scholar
JKI (Julius Kühn-Institut). (2013). Vitis International Variety Catalogue. Institute for Grapevine Breeding, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Geilweilerhof. Available at www.vivc.de.Google Scholar
Johnson, H., and Robinson, J. (2013). World Atlas of Wine, 7th ed. London: Mitchell Beasley.Google Scholar
OIV. (2012). International List of Vine Varieties and Their Synonyms. Paris: Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin (International Organisation of Vine and Wine). Available at www.oiv.org.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., Harding, J., and Vouillamoz, J. (2012). Wine Grapes: A Complete Guide to 1,368 Vine Varieties, Including Their Origins and Flavours. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar