Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:28:37.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Effect of Information on the Reservation Price for Champagne: What are Consumers Actually Paying for?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Pierre Combris ,
Christine Lange  and
Sylvie Issanchou
Pierre Combris
Affiliation:
INRA, Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Consommation (CORELA), 65, Bd de Brandebourg, 94205 Ivry-sur-Seine Cedex France, E-mail:[email protected]
Christine Lange
Affiliation:
CNRS, Centre Européen des Sciences du Goût (CESG), Dijon France
Sylvie Issanchou
Affiliation:
INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherche Flaveur, Vision, Comportement du Consommateur (FLAVIC), Dijon France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two series of Vickrey auctions have been performed to assess the effect of packaging information (bottle and label) on the reservation prices of ordinary consumers for five brut non-vintage Champagnes. As in other studies on wine tasting, packaging information is found to explain much more of the variation in willingness to pay than sensory information. Participants are unable, or unwilling, to put different values on the Champagnes after blind tasting, but significant differences in reservation prices appear when labels are disclosed. Detailed analysis of choices reveals a large heterogeneity in individual behaviors and valuations of the Champagnes included in this study. (JEL Classification: C91, D12)

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 2006 , pp. 75 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G., DeGroot, M. and Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioural Science, 9, 226–232.Google Scholar
Combris, P., Lange, C. and Issanchou, S. (2001). Assessing the effect of information on the reservation price for Champagne: second price compared to BDM auctions with unspecified price bounds. Oenometries VIII Conference, May 21–22, Napa Valley, California, and 6th Conference of Experimental Economics, May 23–24, 2002, Paris.Google Scholar
Hayes, D., Shogren, J., Shin, S.Y. and Kliebenstein, J. (1995). Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 40–53.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, D., Chakravarti, D., Field, R. and Whipple, G. (1993). Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: a case study of new packaging for fresh beef. Marketing Science, 12, 318–338.Google Scholar
Kagel, J.H. (1995). Auctions: a survey of experimental research in Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (eds). The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 501–585.Google Scholar
Lange, C., Martin, C., Chabanet, C., Combris, P. and Issanchou, S. (2002). Impact of the information provided to the consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: comparison with hedonic score. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 597–608.Google Scholar
Lecocq, S., Magnac, T., Pichery, M.C. and Visser, M. (1999). The Impact of information on wine auction prices: results of an experiment. Document de travail CREST, 9936.Google Scholar
Lecocq, S. and Visser, M. (2006). What determines wine prices: objectives vs. sensory characteristics? Journal of Wine Economics, 1, 42–56.Google Scholar
Lecocq, S. and Visser, M. (2001). Is the average of expert tasters' grades a good price predictor? Mimeo.Google Scholar
Melton, B., Huffman, W., Shogren, J. and Fox, J. (1996). Consumer preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 916–923.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, D., Borden, G., Whipple, G., Hoffman, E. and Field, R. (1992). An empirical application of laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
Morrat, G., Brochet, F. and Dubourdieu, D. (2001). The color of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309–320.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.Google Scholar