Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:55:43.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Agricultural and Food Trade in the First Globalization: Spanish Table Wine Exports 1871 to 1935 – A Case Study*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Vicente Pinilla
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Economic History, University of Zaragoza, Gran Via 4, 50005 Zaragoza (Spain), email: [email protected]
Raúl Serrano
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, University of Zaragoza, Gran Via 4, 50005 Zaragoza (Spain), email: [email protected]

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to analyze the overall trajectory of Spanish table wine exports during the period 1871–1935 and provide convincing explanations of the pattern. Thus, we employ an approach that takes all of the possible explanatory factors into account, instead of adopting a narrower approach which focuses on a single principal factor. The methodology employed consists of using a gravity model to explain trade flows in Spanish table wine. Our results highlight the key role of trade policies in the determination of export possibilities and the difficulties derived from the export of products which are characterized by the low or non-existent change in demand when income changes. These results may shed a little more light on the determinants of trade in the first phase of globalization. (JEL Classification: F14, N73, N74, Q17)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.E., and Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 170192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aparicio, G., Pinilla, V. and Serrano, R. (2009). Europe and the international trade in agricultural and food products, 1870–2000. In: Lains, P. and Pinilla, V. (eds.), Agriculture and Economic Development in Europe since 1870. London: Routledge, 86110.Google Scholar
Aparicio, G., Ayuda, M.I. and Pinilla, V. (2002). World consumption of Wine, 1859–1938: an obstacle to the growth of its production and trade?” In: Maldonado, J. (ed.), Actas del I Simposio de la Asociación Internacional de Historia y Civilización de la Vid y el Vino, vol. II, Asociación Internacional de Historia y Civilización de la Vid y el Vino. Puerto de Santa María, 679694.Google Scholar
Ayuda, M.I., Aparicio, G. and Pinilla, V. (1998). France and the international wine trade, 1850–1938. Cahiers Scientifiques de l'Institut Europeen de Conjoncture Viti-Vinicole, 120.Google Scholar
Baier, S. and Bergstrand, J. (2001). The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. Journal of International Economics, 53, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, B. (2008). La temprana vitivinicultura en Uruguay: surgimiento y consolidación (1870–1930). América en la Historia Económica, 29, 101129.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, J.H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, J.H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnero, T. (1980). Expansión vinícola y atraso agrario, 1870–1900. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura.Google Scholar
Dunlevy, J.A. and Hutchinson, W.K. (1999). The impact of immigration on American import trade in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Journal of Economic History, 59(4), 10431062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B. and Taylor, A.M. (2003). The rise and fall of world trade, 1870–1939. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 359407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.A. and Rose, A.K. (1998). Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34 (4), 430447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, A. (2004). Un ‘mercado étnico’ en el Plata. Emigración y exportaciones españolas a la Argentina, 1880–1935. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Fidrmuc, J. (2004). The core and periphery of the world economy. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 13(1), 89106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, R. and Taylor, A.M. (2005). Collateral damage: the economic impact of war, 1870–1997. NBER Working Paper Series, WP 11565.Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis. 4th ed., London: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. (1999). Have international transportation costs declined? Working Paper Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Irwin, D.A. (2002). Long-run trends in world trade and income. World Trade Review, 1(1), 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isnard, H. (1954). La vigne en Algérie: étude géographique. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Jacks, D.J. (2005). Immigrant stocks and trade flows, 1870–1913. Journal of European Economic History, 34(3), 625649.Google Scholar
Jacks, D.J. (2006). What drove 19th century commodity market integration? Explorations in Economic History, 43, 383412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, D.J., Meissner, C.M. and Novy, D. (2008). Trade costs, 1870–2000. American Economic Review, 98(2), 529534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, D. J. and Pendakar, K. (2007). Global trade and the maritime transport revolution. Working Paper, Simon Fraser University, http://www.sfu.ca/~djacks/papers/workingpapers/transport.pdf.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1995). Growing world trade: causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 327377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachiver, M. (1988). Vins, Vignes et Vignerons. Histoire du Vignoble Français. Lille: Fayard.Google Scholar
López-Cordova, J.E. and Meissner, C.M. (2003). Exchange-rate regimes and international trade: evidence from the classical gold standard era. American Economic Review, 93, 1, 344354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateu, A.M. and Stein, S. (forthcoming). Diálogos entre sordos, los pragmáticos y los técnicos en la época inicial de la industria vitivinícola argentina. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Mitchener, K.J. and Weidenmier, M. (2008). Trade and empire. The Economic Journal, 118(533), 18051834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K.H. and Williamson, J. G. (1999). Globalization and History. The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan-Montojo, J. (1994). La bodega del mundo. La vid y el vino en España (1800–1936). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Pech, R. (1975). Enterprise viticole et capitalisme en Languedoc-Roussillon: du Phylloxera aux crises de mevente. Publications de l'Université de Toulouse: Toulouse.Google Scholar
Pinilla, V. and Ayuda, M.I. (2002). The political economy of the wine trade: Spanish exports and the international market, 1890–1935. European Review of Economic History, 6, 5185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinilla, V. and Ayuda, M.I. (2008). Market dynamism and international trade: a case study of Mediterranean agricultural products, 1850–1935. Applied Economics, 40(5), 583595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, R. and Pinilla, V. (forthcoming). Causes of world trade growth in agricultural and food products, 1951–2000: a demand function approach. Applied Economics.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (1995). Spanish Agriculture: the Long Siesta, 1765–1965. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (2004). Selling to reluctant drinkers: the British wine market, 1860–1914. Economic History Review, 57(1), 80108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. (2005). Cooperation and conflicts: institutional innovation in France's wine markets, 1870–1911. Business History Review, 79, 527558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar