Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:24:58.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protection Against Wine Price Risks: A Real Option Approach*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2012

Jean-Laurent Viviani
Jean-Laurent Viviani
Affiliation:
ISEM, Espace Richter, rue Vendémiaire, Bât. B, CS 19519, 34960 Montpellier Cedex 2, Tel. +33 (0) 4 67 41 90 25, e-mail:[email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2006, the federation of wine producers (Inter-Rhône) offers its members (wine producers of the Rhône Valley) protection against wine price risks giving them the option to sell a portion of their production at €80 per hl, regardless of the prevailing market price. This risk management tool has the general features of an American put option with a strike price of 80 €/hl. Two mechanisms are used to reduce the hedging cost: the introduction of a barrier “up and out”, and the option to force producers to implement a non-optimal exercise strategy. We present two pricing models of this option (with and without barrier) followed by an application using the Inter-Rhône wine price data base. The cost of the first protection mechanism (without barrier) is about €10 per hi (i.e., 13.3 % of the current price) but only about €8 for the second (with barrier) representing 10.7 % of the current price. Beyond its traditional role of protection against price fluctuation, the option may also have a positive impact on price levels by stopping panic movements and strengthening the negotiating power of producers. (JEL Classification: Q14, G32)

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Fall 2007 , pp. 168 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abowd, J. and Kaplan, D. (1999). Executive compensation: six questions that need answering. NBER Working Paper No. 7124. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone-Adesi, G. (2005). The saga of the American put. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 2909–2918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehlje, M.D. and Lins, D.A. (1998). Risks and risk management in an industrialized agriculture. Agriculture Finance Review, 58, 1–16.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. (1991). The price of convenience and the valuation of commodity contingent claim. In Lund, D. and Øksendahl, B. (eds.), Stochastic models and option values, application to resources, environment and investment problems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Brennan, M. and Schwartz, E. (1985). Evaluating Natural Resource Investments, Journal of Business, April, 133–155.Google Scholar
Carpenter, J.N. (1998). The Exercise and Valuation of Executive Stock Options, Journal of Financial Economics 48, 127–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J.C., Ross, S.A. and Rubinstein, M. (1979). Option pricing: a simplified approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 229–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. and Pindyck, R. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2001). Risk management tools for EU agriculture. Working Document. Brussels: Agriculture Directorate-General.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. and Shiu, E. (1994). Martingale approach to pricing perpetual American options. ASTIN Bulletin, 24, 2, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. and Schwartz, E. (1990). Stochastic conveniences yield and the pricing of oil contingent claims. Journal of Finance 45, 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, J. and Reiss, J. (1998). Valuation of commodity futures and options under stochastic convenience yields, interest rates, and jump diffusions in the spot. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33, 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddart, S. and Lang, M. (1996). Employee Stock Option Exercises: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, 1, 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J. (1997). Options, Futures and other Derivatives. 3rd edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
Hull, J. and White, A. (2003). Accounting for Employee Stock Options. Working Paper. Toronto University.Google Scholar
King, A.M. & Parrish, S. (2002). Options can be valued. Strategic Finance, October, 50–54.Google Scholar
Korn, O. (2005). Drift Matters: An Analysis of Commodity Derivatives. The Journal of Futures Markets, 25, 3, 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulatilaka, N. and Marcus, A. (1994). Valuing employee stock options. Financial Analysts Journal, 50, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R.A., Larcker, D.F. and Verrecchia, R.E. (1991). Portfolio Considerations in valuing executive compensation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. In Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Reid, S.F., O'Connor, M.L. and Shapiro, M.J. (2006). The Valuation of Employee Stock Options Issued by Closely Held Firms. Journal of Legal Economics, 13, 2, 19–44.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. (1997). The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging. The Journal of Finance 52, 3, 923–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, E. and Smith, J. (2000). Short term variations and long term dynamics in commodity prices, Management Science 46, 893–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, C. (2002). Modelling seasonality in agriculture commodity futures. Journal of Future Markets, 22, 393–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viviani, J-L. (2006). Risk management of the agricultural income: the Inter-Rhône reserve. British Food Journal, 108, 4, 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar