Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:38:16.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-Term Prospects of the International Wine Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Olivier Bargain
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux (LAREFI), ave L. Duguit, 33608, PESSAC; e-mail: [email protected].
Jean-Marie Cardebat
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux (LAREFI), ave L. Duguit, 33608, PESSAC; INSEEC U., H19, Bordeaux; e-mail: [email protected].
Raphael Chiappini
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux (LAREFI), ave L. Duguit, 33608, PESSAC; e-mail: [email protected].
Corentin Laffitte
Affiliation:
University of Bordeaux (LAREFI), ave L. Duguit, 33608, PESSAC; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

This article discusses key comparative advantages of wine-producing nations and suggest prospective views on their evolution. Our methodology is twofold. First, we study comparative advantages in 16 countries using Porter's diamond. Then, we report results from a survey in which wine economists are asked to assess the future trade performance of these countries. Results are relatively consistent across methods regarding the future “heavy weights” like China, but also New Zealand and Chile, countries show the greatest potential to succeed in the future global wine trade. It is also expected that Georgia, the United Kingdom, and Australia play an important role, although to a lesser extent. Our findings indicate that comparative advantages in wine trade are neither uniform nor static; especially, terroir is no longer sufficient. The diamond approach contradicts experts from two countries in particular, France and Argentina, suggesting that experts put great emphasis on demand and market structures as key trade determinants for the future. (JEL Classifications: F14, Q17)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank the participants of the 2018 AAWE conference held in Ithaca on 10–14 June and, an anonymous reviewer, and, in particular, Karl Storchmann, who helped to disseminate our questionnaire.

References

Anderson, K., and Wittwer, G. (2013). Modeling global wine markets to 2018: Exchange rates, taste changes, and China's import growth. Journal of Wine Economics, 8(2), 131158.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., and Wittwer, G. (2017). The UK and global wine markets by 2025, and implications of Brexit. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(3), 221251.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., and Wittwer, G. (2018). Projecting global wine markets to 2025. In Anderson, K. and Pinilla, V. (eds.), Wine Globalization, A New Comparative History, 493516. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Norman, D., and Wittwer, G. (2003). Globalization of the world's wine markets. World Economy, 26(5), 659687.Google Scholar
Esterhuizen, D., Stroebel, L., and Van Rooyen, J. (2011). Analyzing the competitive performance of the South African wine industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(4), 179200.Google Scholar
European Commission (2017). EU Agricultural outlook for the agricultural markets and income 2017–2030. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/markets-and-prices/medium-term-outlook/2017/2017-fullrep_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985–98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 337369.Google Scholar
Linder, S. B. (1961). An Essay on Trade and Transformation (pp. 82109). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Morrison, A., and Rabellotti, R. (2017). Gradual catch up and enduring leadership in the global wine industry. Research Policy, 46(2), 417430.Google Scholar
OIV (2017). Global State of Conditions Report. International Organisation of Vine and Wine. Available at http://www.oiv.int.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, (March–April), 7393.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (2010). Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Uchida, Y., and Cook, P. (2005). The transformation of competitive advantage in East Asia: An analysis of technological and trade specialization. World Development, 33(5), 701728.Google Scholar